Free 383 for Blaze

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

74Blaze

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2022
Posts
384
Reaction score
1,534
Location
Nashville, IN
First Name
Gerald
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
K5/Blazer
Engine Size
350
@bucket
t And that's the crate 350 head? If you still don't want to try running the double humps and you don't have the budget for aftermarket heads, pretty much any large chamber smogger head will be a comparable replacement. They are a trash head to most people and will be practically free.

Yep, the Crate 350 Head. Don't want 11+:1 Compression, so I'm not using the Double Humps. I increased the budget and ordered the Summit SUM-152123 Heads. They are on sale right now for $499.99 each. By my calculation, I'll end up with about 10.2:1 compression. Probably the right decision. Sometimes I just end-up spending more money than I wanted to.

A closer look at my pictures shows that the Head Gasket was damaged in that area as well. Don't know which came first, the cracked Head or the damaged Gasket.
You must be registered for see images attach
 

legopnuematic

Licensed Junk Dealer
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Posts
5,619
Reaction score
21,614
Location
MO
First Name
Spencer
Truck Year
1971, 1̶9̶7̶4, 1976, 1979,1̶9̶8̶5, 2002
Truck Model
Dart Swinger, Sierra 10, C10 Cheyenne, C10 Big Ten, Silverado 10, Ram 2500
Engine Size
225/6, 350 c.i., 350 c.i., 5.9l Cummins
Those Summit heads are what I have on my 76. They were $350/ea back in 2019. If you didn’t know, they are Dart Iron Eagle heads.

Been in the truck since 2019 and 30k miles. No issues.
 

74Blaze

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2022
Posts
384
Reaction score
1,534
Location
Nashville, IN
First Name
Gerald
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
K5/Blazer
Engine Size
350
@legopnuematic

Good to know, Thank you.

I plan on using the 600 CFM Edelbrock 1406 Carburetor that has been on the Blazer for years. So the next question is what Intake Manifold should I use.

Options:
1) Use the original 1974 Blazer Intake (Pictured on top below)
2) Use the 1970 350 Intake that has been sitting around in my garage for years (Picture on the bottom below, needs reconditioning)
3) Dip further into our emergency savings and buy an aftermarket aluminum Intake. If so which one should I get?

You must be registered for see images attach
 
Last edited:

xm20k

Runs on 93 octane, caffeine, and spite
Supporting Member
Joined
May 26, 2025
Posts
1,427
Reaction score
3,764
Location
Girard, Ohio
First Name
David
Truck Year
78
Truck Model
c10
Engine Size
388
If your carb will work and you don't mind cleaning up the stock manifold go for it but if you're looking for a bit of an upgrade the best deal for a universal (fits both old GM and vortec pattern) air gap style intake is about $200

 

74Blaze

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2022
Posts
384
Reaction score
1,534
Location
Nashville, IN
First Name
Gerald
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
K5/Blazer
Engine Size
350
If your carb will work and you don't mind cleaning up the stock manifold go for it but if you're looking for a bit of an upgrade the best deal for a universal (fits both old GM and vortec pattern) air gap style intake is about $200
Thanks @xm29k

I've decided to use the old Intake. I'm having it sandblasted and the Gasket Surfaces freshened-up. It was originally the stock Intake that came on my long gone 1970 Monte Carlo which had the 300HP 350. That engine dropped a valve back around the turn of the century when it was in my '79 C10.

Working on cleaning and painting parts that will be used...
You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
 

74Blaze

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2022
Posts
384
Reaction score
1,534
Location
Nashville, IN
First Name
Gerald
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
K5/Blazer
Engine Size
350
The intake cleaned-up nice...


You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
 

74Blaze

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2022
Posts
384
Reaction score
1,534
Location
Nashville, IN
First Name
Gerald
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
K5/Blazer
Engine Size
350
I learned something new. Went to assemble the Timing Gear and discovered a bolt circle mis-match. After a call to Comp Cams, it turns out that the Roller Cam requires a Camshaft Retaining Plate making the smaller bolt circle necessary. the 383 has the 1995-2000 Engine Block, so it was just a matter of purchasing the Camshaft Retaining Plate and the correct Timing set. More money into the "Free 383" project.


You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
35,916
Reaction score
46,485
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
I learned something new. Went to assemble the Timing Gear and discovered a bolt circle mis-match. After a call to Comp Cams, it turns out that the Roller Cam requires a Camshaft Retaining Plate making the smaller bolt circle necessary. the 383 has the 1995-2000 Engine Block, so it was just a matter of purchasing the Camshaft Retaining Plate and the correct Timing set. More money into the "Free 383" project.


You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach

More correctly, it's not because of it being a roller cam. It's because the cam is designed as a replacement for a factory-installed ('87+) roller cam. A standard aftermarket roller cam that requires a cam button would use a cam sprocket with the regular bolt pattern.
 

74Blaze

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2022
Posts
384
Reaction score
1,534
Location
Nashville, IN
First Name
Gerald
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
K5/Blazer
Engine Size
350
Next issue. I have a slight interference that I traced down to a few of the Connecting Rods contacting the Cam Lobes in certain crank positions. I need to have the tops of the Rod Cap Screw Bosses chamfered to eliminate the contact. The area that I marked in Red in the picture below is where the chamfer needs to be. Anyone know of a good engine machine shop in the Southern Indiana area? Anywhere from Indianapolis to Louisville, KY would be OK

You must be registered for see images attach
 

74Blaze

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2022
Posts
384
Reaction score
1,534
Location
Nashville, IN
First Name
Gerald
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
K5/Blazer
Engine Size
350
Found my Connecting rods on the Eagle Specialties site. Sometime between when Roach bought them and now they added chamfers where I need them. Oh well, I found a shop in Indy that is going to fix mine so they won't interfere with the Cam Lobes.
You must be registered for see images attach
 

ChuckN

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2022
Posts
2,284
Reaction score
8,497
Location
Bellinham, WA
First Name
Chad
Truck Year
1981
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
350
Found my Connecting rods on the Eagle Specialties site. Sometime between when Roach bought them and now they added chamfers where I need them. Oh well, I found a shop in Indy that is going to fix mine so they won't interfere with the Cam Lobes.
You must be registered for see images attach
Might be cheaper depending on how much the machining is, to get a small base circle cam. Many companies offer them off the shelf. Just food for thought.
 

ChuckN

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2022
Posts
2,284
Reaction score
8,497
Location
Bellinham, WA
First Name
Chad
Truck Year
1981
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
350
Ah, never mind, they’re more expensive than I remembered in mid-500s.
 

Craig Nedrow

NADAR UNDER THE RADAR
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2018
Posts
1,710
Reaction score
4,302
Location
Washington State
First Name
Craig
Truck Year
1973 (have two), 1985
Truck Model
K10, K20, C20
Engine Size
350, 454, 6.2 Detroit
man, just grind them yourself, however if this has geen prevously balanced, they will need to be rebalanced. Weigh them before and after to see how much was taken off. Wish I was close, could put them in the mill and be done in an hour.
 

74Blaze

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2022
Posts
384
Reaction score
1,534
Location
Nashville, IN
First Name
Gerald
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
K5/Blazer
Engine Size
350
@Craig Nedrow @ChuckN
Yeah, Roach, the original builder had it balanced. Sh!t, the engine was ready to drop in if I wanted a high-RPM race motor. The machinist in Indy will make it right. Just cost more time and money. But the goal is to have a strong running engine in the Blazer by next Spring. I don't drive it from the time the salt the roads until the Spring rains have washed them all clean. So, I'm more interested in having it right then rushing to get it done.
 

JBswth

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2022
Posts
351
Reaction score
272
Location
Vallejo, California
First Name
James
Truck Year
1973
Truck Model
C25
Engine Size
292 cubic inches
Yep. That's what I was afraid of. They guy used the '55 as a street racer back in the 80s & 90s. I'll need to figure out what Cam I want in it for my trail rig. I don't mind the 11:1 compression as I'm thinking that it should run fine on 91-93 octane with the right Cam. No need to worry about the stall speed as I'm running an SM465 manual.
No it won't run fine on pump gas with 11:1 compression. It might not ping under load at normal speeds, but it may very well ping at the high RPM that cam is intended for, and high RPM pinging can knock holes in your pistons. You need a torque cam and much lower compression.

J. B.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
48,735
Posts
1,088,073
Members
43,904
Latest member
alex7915
Top