255 vs 285 metric 33” tires on factory wheel

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Frankenchevy

Proverbs 16:18
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Posts
6,779
Reaction score
9,380
Location
USA
First Name
Jeremy
Truck Year
Square
Truck Model
CUCV
Engine Size
Small
I was pretty much set on trying out the new Cooper Stronghold AT on the burb, but now I’m kicking around getting a 255/85-16 for the factory 16x6.5” steelies instead. Unfortunately, the Falken AT4W is the only 3 peak rated tire in that size.

Two problems:

1-No RWL
2-The Falken isn’t the greatest in the snow.

Either way, I want to get the chinese mud tires that came on the Burb off.
You must be registered for see images attach
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
35,425
Reaction score
44,732
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
Have you personally run the AT4W?

Pretty sure that's what we put on a couple of the work trucks. We were very happy with their midwest snow performance. The truck that I drive got a set of the Wildpeak R/T's and I've been extremely happy with those too, in the snow. They are just slightly more aggressive of a tread design than the A/T's.
 

Frankenchevy

Proverbs 16:18
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Posts
6,779
Reaction score
9,380
Location
USA
First Name
Jeremy
Truck Year
Square
Truck Model
CUCV
Engine Size
Small
Have you personally run the AT4W?

Pretty sure that's what we put on a couple of the work trucks. We were very happy with their midwest snow performance. The truck that I drive got a set of the Wildpeak R/T's and I've been extremely happy with those too, in the snow. They are just slightly more aggressive of a tread design than the A/T's.
Not personally, basing it on this:
You must be registered for see images attach

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

This is certainly not the end all be all, and I’m still considering the Falken, as it’s the only option in a 255. Hoping someone will come along with some skinny 33” photos.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
35,425
Reaction score
44,732
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
Not personally, basing it on this:
You must be registered for see images attach

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

This is certainly not the end all be all, and I’m still considering the Falken, as it’s the only option in a 255. Hoping someone will come along with some skinny 33” photos.

I won't watch that video, all those TFL shows seem to be a bunch of garbage, imho. And Jeep testing is not a similar comparison to use on a heavy truck. And those new KO3's suck, even in wet grass, lol.

I ran 255's on the front of one of my old Burbs. Just low-tread old BFG's. I've got some pictures somewhere.
 

Frankenchevy

Proverbs 16:18
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Posts
6,779
Reaction score
9,380
Location
USA
First Name
Jeremy
Truck Year
Square
Truck Model
CUCV
Engine Size
Small
I won't watch that video, all those TFL shows seem to be a bunch of garbage, imho. And Jeep testing is not a similar comparison to use on a heavy truck. And those new KO3's suck, even in wet grass, lol.

I ran 255's on the front of one of my old Burbs. Just low-tread old BFG's. I've got some pictures somewhere.
Not a huge fan of their videos either, but the spread seemed far enough to be more than testing error.

I haven’t tried the KO3 yet, mostly due to all of the reports surrounding balancing issues. I have nothing to back this up, but I feel like the amount of weight a tire takes to balance is inversely related to the tire manufacturer’s QC.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
35,425
Reaction score
44,732
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
Not a huge fan of their videos either, but the spread seemed far enough to be more than testing error.

I haven’t tried the KO3 yet, mostly due to all of the reports surrounding balancing issues. I have nothing to back this up, but I feel like the amount of weight a tire takes to balance is inversely related to the tire manufacturer’s QC.

Maybe on a Jeep it is a different world. Ain't know way in he!! I'd put a set of KO3's on a truck, but I sure would run a set of Wildpeak AT's. And I've generally always been a big fan of BFG products.
 

Grit dog

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
9,558
Reaction score
17,538
Location
The Right side of Washington
First Name
Todd
Truck Year
1986, 1977
Truck Model
K20, C10
Engine Size
454, 350
Not personally, basing it on this:
You must be registered for see images attach

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

This is certainly not the end all be all, and I’m still considering the Falken, as it’s the only option in a 255. Hoping someone will come along with some skinny 33” photos.
Well I’d say those results are not accurate in any apples to apples test.
 

Grit dog

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
9,558
Reaction score
17,538
Location
The Right side of Washington
First Name
Todd
Truck Year
1986, 1977
Truck Model
K20, C10
Engine Size
454, 350
I won't watch that video, all those TFL shows seem to be a bunch of garbage, imho. And Jeep testing is not a similar comparison to use on a heavy truck. And those new KO3's suck, even in wet grass, lol.

I ran 255's on the front of one of my old Burbs. Just low-tread old BFG's. I've got some pictures somewhere.
Hahaha I didn’t even look. TFL = clown show.
 

Grit dog

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
9,558
Reaction score
17,538
Location
The Right side of Washington
First Name
Todd
Truck Year
1986, 1977
Truck Model
K20, C10
Engine Size
454, 350
I was pretty much set on trying out the new Cooper Stronghold AT on the burb, but now I’m kicking around getting a 255/85-16 for the factory 16x6.5” steelies instead. Unfortunately, the Falken AT4W is the only 3 peak rated tire in that size.

Two problems:

1-No RWL
2-The Falken isn’t the greatest in the snow.

Either way, I want to get the chinese mud tires that came on the Burb off.
You must be registered for see images attach
I’m maybe not understanding the question. You want to see pics of both sizes on a square? Or connundrum about the brand/performance?
If it’s wet/snow performance, and those rice grinder mudders are in good shape and run out good, just get them siped full width as deep as possible and go eat up wet and snowy roads.
If theyre anywhere near approaching 50% wear though, I agree, get new tires for best snow traction.
 

Frankenchevy

Proverbs 16:18
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Posts
6,779
Reaction score
9,380
Location
USA
First Name
Jeremy
Truck Year
Square
Truck Model
CUCV
Engine Size
Small
I’m maybe not understanding the question. You want to see pics of both sizes on a square? Or connundrum about the brand/performance?
If it’s wet/snow performance, and those rice grinder mudders are in good shape and run out good, just get them siped full width as deep as possible and go eat up wet and snowy roads.
If theyre anywhere near approaching 50% wear though, I agree, get new tires for best snow traction.
They don’t ride great and they’re somewhat loud. I’d prefer to get a decent set of ATs and use these as rollers for my 75 ford that currently has flat front tires.
 

DoubleDingo

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Posts
14,027
Reaction score
24,143
Location
Right where I am
First Name
Bagoomba
Truck Year
1981
Truck Model
81-C20 Silverado Camper Special-TH400-4.10s
Engine Size
Carb'ed Vortec 350
I personally prefer General ATX.
 

TotalyHucked

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2020
Posts
7,057
Reaction score
26,411
Location
Auburn, Georgia
First Name
Zach
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
Sierra 1500
Engine Size
5.3
I agree with @bucket I'd run the Falkens in a heartbeat. I had the AT3W on my LB7 and it did fantastic in the snow, even our nasty, slushy, wet snow. I also put a set of them on our '07 NNBS LML ECSB 4x4 at work, they've done fantastic in mud, snow, wet grass, everything. They're also quiet on the highway and have worn fantastic, I think we have ~35-40k on them, they're still wearing perfect and have more than half tread
 

Frankenchevy

Proverbs 16:18
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Posts
6,779
Reaction score
9,380
Location
USA
First Name
Jeremy
Truck Year
Square
Truck Model
CUCV
Engine Size
Small
Has anyone had similar 255s and 285s on stock width wheels? Probably a long shot…

Looking for input on differences between the two sizes with handling.
 

Frankenchevy

Proverbs 16:18
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Posts
6,779
Reaction score
9,380
Location
USA
First Name
Jeremy
Truck Year
Square
Truck Model
CUCV
Engine Size
Small
Calling around and no one will really mount a 285 on a 6.5” wheel anymore. This may be the impetus to finally get a tire machine.
 

Frankenchevy

Proverbs 16:18
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Posts
6,779
Reaction score
9,380
Location
USA
First Name
Jeremy
Truck Year
Square
Truck Model
CUCV
Engine Size
Small
Yet another wrinkle…the Falken is a C load tire in that size. The only 255/85-16 that’s not an E load at America’s Tire.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
48,666
Posts
1,074,176
Members
43,338
Latest member
jw23655
Top