283 small journal questions

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
29,103
Reaction score
23,969
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
She has a runnng driving lng water pump vehicle and trying to pic between 4 engines she has 3 long water pump 305,350,400 and the 283 I was just saying in my opinion easiest surest thing for a plow truck was the 400. Which everything would be a bolt for bolt quick swap and have enough balls to push her plow. Anx swapping her old motor back in if she wantedwould be simple as well.

Agreed. The 400 should be the first choice, if it's good. I'm just biased towards the 283 and would love having an excuse to drop one in something.
 

Grit dog

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
5,975
Reaction score
9,917
Location
Washington
First Name
Todd
Truck Year
1986
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
454
Make the 283 run and if it runs good, sell it to help fund your next truck.
Great engines and worth some $ of original.
Largely worthless as a drop in, in a newer vehicle though. For reasons already mentioned.
 

Ricko1966

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2017
Posts
4,067
Reaction score
5,916
Location
kansas
First Name
Rick
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
c20
Engine Size
350
15/16 years old I built a 1974 Vega GT 283 glide.Wanted so bad to go 4 inch bore 6 inch rods 4speed.Now that would have been a party.
 

HotRodPC

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
47,014
Reaction score
9,014
Location
OKC, OK
First Name
HotRod
Truck Year
85 K20 LWB
Truck Model
Silverado
Engine Size
454 - Turbo 400 - 3.73
There was only a couple 283s in my small town in high school. I had one of them in Mean Green. The other was in an Impala, and he tried for months to blow it up because he wanted a different engine. It wouldn't die. Powerglide transmission left in 1st, run it WOT and it just kept going. Eventually he gave up and just swapped engines. The one in my truck, I could run it all day in summer heat at 4,000 rpms going down the highway. Never skipped a beat.
That's one thing the 283's loved was rpm !!! You wind'em up tight and they kept going and going. Of course the small journal 327's were the same way.
 

DoubleDingo

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Posts
10,182
Reaction score
14,489
Location
Right where I am
First Name
Bagoomba
Truck Year
1981, 1965
Truck Model
81-C20 Silverado Camper Special-TH400-4.10s; 65-C20 with 4:57 gears and Borg Warner Overdrive
Engine Size
Carb'ed Vortec 350; 1972 L48 350
That's one thing the 283's loved was rpm !!! You wind'em up tight and they kept going and going. Of course the small journal 327's were the same way.

I never thought anything of it until I installed the tachometer. That's when I realized what I'd been running that engine at. The 350 I replaced it with didn't like it but did just fine. I thought the 350 would be better than the 283. It was at more torque but that was it. The 350 was probably better suited for the 3.54 gears that went in about a year after the swap. Other than that the 283 was perfectly fine. People just don't like them much anymore because they can install an LS. Personally I can't see any reason to hack up a perfectly fine automobile to fit a newfangled powerplant.
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,214
Reaction score
6,196
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
I never thought anything of it until I installed the tachometer. That's when I realized what I'd been running that engine at. The 350 I replaced it with didn't like it but did just fine. I thought the 350 would be better than the 283. It was at more torque but that was it. The 350 was probably better suited for the 3.54 gears that went in about a year after the swap. Other than that the 283 was perfectly fine. People just don't like them much anymore because they can install an LS. Personally I can't see any reason to hack up a perfectly fine automobile to fit a newfangled powerplant.
Especially when real world gains are there, yes, but the money and time to do it could have just made a sick small block to personal perfection. And lots more natural compatibility with like.. everything gm gmde in the era
 

Rusty Nail

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Posts
9,787
Reaction score
9,681
Location
the other side of the internet
First Name
Rusty
Truck Year
1977
Truck Model
C20
Engine Size
350sbc
Oh yeah.

My opinion is the best value of a perfectly fine 283 would be whatever you could sell it to somebody else for.

OR

You could "part out" tke 305 to it if you really wanted it, it has everything youd need to "fix it up". If thats what it is.
Swap the heads and the front accessories off of it, maybe its seized.

This is the internet though. Its easy to look up casting numbers auroragirl, why are you guessing at displacement?
Silly.
Its on the back if the block -firewall side- behind and kinda underneath the driver side cylinder head.
There is a flat area there... clean.it off and google the numbers, geez.
Pix. W.T.F. ??

P.S.
There is "no replacement for displacement".
Bigger is better.

The 350 is likely the best choice of the 4 but the 400 is the most valuable.

Hope this helps!
 

Memaloose

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2018
Posts
500
Reaction score
1,388
Location
Dolan Springs, AZ
First Name
Tony
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
Of the three, I'd rebuild the 283. You can get hardened seats for the valves installed. You can buy fan spacers to extend the fan closer to the radiator and there are also longer fan shrouds.
283's are hard to come by anymore, I've run a few of them and I like them, good economy and V8 power. Headers and a 2bbl carb and you're set.
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,214
Reaction score
6,196
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
283 I built for the 73 I gave my oldest granddaughter. Has the 305 HO heads.

You must be registered for see images attach
That is a fine looking machine. I appreciate the orange. i LOVE the valve covers on the 283, the old script, but if I were to use it in any fashion id be putting a PCV on, which means Id have to get reproductions with two grommet holes and baffles, they arent AS pretty but it would remove the draft tube and thats not a huge trade off.

And the 283 being from an era of leaded gasoline doesnt dissaude me, I was asking more, assuming all engines are capable of running and have no blaring problems, what could i spruce up and refresh(not rebuild) so i have a backup. Which, in the 283, means I would prob do some gaskets and obvious accessory drive changes, but I would run lead substitute to get around valve seats.

@Rusty Nail Im not gonna lie, i was a little lazy. and the one is in a bitch of a spot with poor lighting. I could just grab my drill with the wire wheel and go to town, but thats worrrrrrrrrrrkkkkkk . wanna do it for me?
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,214
Reaction score
6,196
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
........:emotions33:


Yes?
but you cant take the powerglide attached to the 283. or the 283. or the 400. or any of the other fun stuff.
no quadrajets, either.
Especially the john deere green one.
 

custodian

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2016
Posts
959
Reaction score
554
Location
Catawba
First Name
William
Truck Year
1973, 1985
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
5.3 LS, 350
That is a fine looking machine. I appreciate the orange. i LOVE the valve covers on the 283, the old script, but if I were to use it in any fashion id be putting a PCV on, which means Id have to get reproductions with two grommet holes and baffles, they arent AS pretty but it would remove the draft tube and thats not a huge trade off.

And the 283 being from an era of leaded gasoline doesnt dissaude me, I was asking more, assuming all engines are capable of running and have no blaring problems, what could i spruce up and refresh(not rebuild) so i have a backup. Which, in the 283, means I would prob do some gaskets and obvious accessory drive changes, but I would run lead substitute to get around valve seats.

@Rusty Nail Im not gonna lie, i was a little lazy. and the one is in a bitch of a spot with poor lighting. I could just grab my drill with the wire wheel and go to town, but thats worrrrrrrrrrrkkkkkk . wanna do it for me?

If you run the 305 heads, you will not need lead substitute because the heads already have the hardened seats in them. They'll also have the bolt holes for the accessories. I've changed the setup since the picture. I put the alternator on an original bracket that mounts higher. I'm running a 350 turbo behind the 283.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
42,129
Posts
909,785
Members
33,626
Latest member
Silverado9019
Top