Purpose in second set of holes in frame from 89 2wd x member?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Vbb199

B-rate Hillbilly Customs
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Posts
8,871
Reaction score
14,885
Location
Salisbury NC
First Name
Vince
Truck Year
89, 79
Truck Model
89 Suburban R1500, 79 C10
Engine Size
350, 502
So yesterday, I got my new badass 700r4 in my 89 suburban, bolted up, TC cable, cooler lines, torque converter, lockup harness, all of it.

So I put a jack under the trans with a block of wood and lifted the tail up so I could put my crossmember in..

I discover it will hit the deep pan on the transmission!!

First thought, being who I am, I say to myself, no problem, I'll just notch. The cross member, so I get a marker, and begin marking where I'll cut....


Then I notice... The frame has a second set of holes roughly 8" away from where I pulled the x crossmember, also, somehow it slipped my attention, so does the transmission (tailshaft housing),

By moving it down that 8" the x member will clear the pan.
Not a problem. But then the weight is being applied to the tailshaft housing rather than previously on the body of the transmission right after the pan.

My questions are =

1. Why is there a second set of holes in the frame? It's a 2wd, I'd understand if it was 4x4 because the crossmember is then attached to the t case adapter , kinda makes sense? Not really, because a 2wd frame is diff than a 4x4.so what gives?

2. Will this be safe to do? I realize from an engineering standpoint, the weight of the trans is supported at the motor, and then the four 3/8 bolts on the tail housing would have to sheer off, but it just looks.... "off" to me.

Tell me your thoughts.
Thanks guys.

I'll send pics of the holes in the frame later if someone wants to see.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Keith Seymore

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Posts
2,609
Reaction score
8,018
Location
Motor City
First Name
Keith Seymore
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
R10
Engine Size
4.3L
Could be for a center support bearing, or for a different crossmember location.

Keep in mind that frame has to cover as many possible combinations as they can. There are very likely going to be a bunch of unused holes for your specific options.

K
 

Vbb199

B-rate Hillbilly Customs
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Posts
8,871
Reaction score
14,885
Location
Salisbury NC
First Name
Vince
Truck Year
89, 79
Truck Model
89 Suburban R1500, 79 C10
Engine Size
350, 502
Could be for a center support bearing, or for a different crossmember location.

Keep in mind that frame has to cover as many possible combinations as they can. There are very likely going to be a bunch of unused holes for your specific options.

K


Since we're on this topic, and you're the man to talk to, I also wanted to ask, why does my 89 have a 2 piece driveshaft?
But my 1990 suburban didn't. It was 1 piece.
 

legopnuematic

Licensed Junk Dealer
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Posts
1,710
Reaction score
3,661
Location
MO
First Name
Spencer
Truck Year
1971, 1̶9̶7̶4, 1976, 1979,1̶9̶8̶5, 2002
Truck Model
Dart Swinger, Sierra 10, C10 Cheyenne, C10 Big Ten, Silverado 10, Ram 2500
Engine Size
225/6, 350 c.i., 350 c.i., 5.9l Cummins
Since we're on this topic, and you're the man to talk to, I also wanted to ask, why does my 89 have a 2 piece driveshaft?
But my 1990 suburban didn't. It was 1 piece.

From what I have gathered 700R4's got 2 piece and 350/400 trans got 1 piece shafts.
 

Vbb199

B-rate Hillbilly Customs
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Posts
8,871
Reaction score
14,885
Location
Salisbury NC
First Name
Vince
Truck Year
89, 79
Truck Model
89 Suburban R1500, 79 C10
Engine Size
350, 502
From what I have gathered 700R4's got 2 piece and 350/400 trans got 1 piece shafts.


My old 90 burb was 700r4, my 89 is a 700r4.

The only differences is, my 90 was a absolute bare base model, the 89 is full options as well as HD radiator, ps cooler, oil cooler, and towing kit,(which is what I assume maybe makes the difference).
 

Keith Seymore

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Posts
2,609
Reaction score
8,018
Location
Motor City
First Name
Keith Seymore
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
R10
Engine Size
4.3L
Since we're on this topic, and you're the man to talk to, I also wanted to ask, why does my 89 have a 2 piece driveshaft?
But my 1990 suburban didn't. It was 1 piece.

It has to do with the driveshaft
"critical speed": the point at which it begins to swing like a jump rope. It is affected by length, outside diameter, thickness, material, mass and rpm. Highest shaft rpm is affected by vehicle top speed, rear axle ratio and tire diameter. Length is affected by wheelbase and driveline configuration.

The driveline is also affected by any unusual or unpredicted system resonances, which can destroy a driveline even at a speed lower than the critical rpm.

From an OE perspective the driveshaft choice (one piece vs two piece) can be manipulated by controlling any one or more of those variables.

So you could have two otherwise identical trucks but one has a smaller diameter tire driving a two-piece shaft; the truck with the larger diameter tire could have a one piece.

Or - you could have two trucks and one has an aluminum composite one piece shaft and the other has a steel two-piece shaft.

Or - you could have a truck that requires a two-piece shaft but is speed limited to 85 mph so that a one piece shaft could be released for that configuration.

Hence there's a little more going on than picking a length and slapping a couple yokes on it (from a production standpoint).

There is a chart that the engineer keeps (like the brake system release charts I have posted in the past) that shows all of the driveline configurations and shaft lengths for every GM light duty truck. I have asked the engineer for it on a couple of occasions but he has not come through with it.

K
 
Last edited:

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
28,966
Reaction score
23,487
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
Since we're on this topic, and you're the man to talk to, I also wanted to ask, why does my 89 have a 2 piece driveshaft?
But my 1990 suburban didn't. It was 1 piece.

Wasn't your '90 a 4x4? My 4x4 Burbs have all had a 1-piece shaft.
 

jake wells

Can i be me?
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Posts
2,133
Reaction score
2,485
Location
Brownsville Kentucky
First Name
jake
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
custom deluxe 10
Engine Size
350
My 75 has a two piece drive shaft with a carrier bearing but my trans is also a short tailshaft th350.
 

Vbb199

B-rate Hillbilly Customs
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Posts
8,871
Reaction score
14,885
Location
Salisbury NC
First Name
Vince
Truck Year
89, 79
Truck Model
89 Suburban R1500, 79 C10
Engine Size
350, 502
The 89 and the 90 both were/are 31" long 700r4 trucks, throttle body 350, 2wd, 10 bolt rear ends.
Everything was identical except packages, options, and gear ratios.

Like @Keith Seymore said, it may be related to gear ratio.
The 90 had a 3.08, the 89 has a 3.42
 

Galane

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Posts
147
Reaction score
38
Location
Idaho
First Name
Gregg
Truck Year
1982
Truck Model
Sierra 3500
Engine Size
350
Different holes in the frame for different transmissions. 3 and 4 speed auto, manual, 4x4 or 2wd. The mounting pad on the tailshaft is where the rear transmission mount should go. That's THICK aluminum and the bolts holding the tail housing to the case are strong, and threaded plenty deep into the transmission case.

If the mounting ears have broken off the tail housing, or the tail housing bolts have sheared, I'd assume something very bad has happened to the rest of the truck, like getting hit by a train.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
41,859
Posts
903,653
Members
33,372
Latest member
83elcowes
Top