Can anyone tell me what this is??

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

PrairieDrifter

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2014
Posts
4,215
Reaction score
6,428
Location
North Dakota
First Name
Mason
Truck Year
84,79,77,76,70,48
Truck Model
Suburban k10, bonanza k10, k30, k20, c10, gmc 1/2ton
Engine Size
350, 350, 350, 350, 350, 350
The large majority of the country could benefit from safety inspections. I'm not going to be a big advocate of it though. Because too many folks with halfway decent vehicles will end up getting hassled over piddly nonsense because the inspector has an authority complex.
Exactly. And a shitbox can still be safe, if it's even driven on the road very much on the first place.

We also have a nice example right here about inspector complex :rofl:
 

Ricko1966

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2017
Posts
6,616
Reaction score
11,274
Location
kansas
First Name
Rick
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
c20
Engine Size
350
Exactly. And a shitbox can still be safe, if it's even driven on the road very much on the first place.

We also have a nice example right here about inspector complex :rofl:
Watch out!!! You'll get accused of lighting fires and eating boogers!!
 

PrairieDrifter

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2014
Posts
4,215
Reaction score
6,428
Location
North Dakota
First Name
Mason
Truck Year
84,79,77,76,70,48
Truck Model
Suburban k10, bonanza k10, k30, k20, c10, gmc 1/2ton
Engine Size
350, 350, 350, 350, 350, 350
Watch out!!! You'll get accused of lighting fires and eating boogers!!
Nah I'm 15 and getting people killed!! Duh!

Crazy what people will say on the internet lol
 

59840Surfer

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2020
Posts
235
Reaction score
365
Location
Montana
First Name
Joe
Truck Year
1986
Truck Model
K5
Engine Size
350 Stroker to 383 with a 400 crank, Crane Cam, Q-Jet, single 3.5" exhaust..
He has been labeled the douche of that family.
Hmmmmm .... a label I would wear proudly.

Rules are good --- that way you know where you stand and how that vehicle coming at you at 60 MPH would hit you at a combined speed of 120MPH if you are driving at the same speed, but something failed or fell off - whatever!

Knowing that they are driving a safe-rated vehicle is reassuring as long as everybody plays in the same ballpark.

The problem with rules is that they create a monster through legislation that just grows and grows and generates a lot of dislike among the players. This is a human - albeit: perverted - way of wielding power - and with power comes corrupted cash flow.

With corrupted cash flow comes anger among the users, and that's where the wheels fall off. Standards are good, though --- think of the testing of brake material and the steel holding the ball joints together and the rubber sealing dirt out and oil in.

If there were no standards - we'd be driving potential deathtraps - both to ourselves and everybody else we face on the highway.



I know that different people see things in different ways. Everyone has different experiences to build their worldview. For all we know, he is just using his experiences as a guidepost to help people he considers his confidants and friends feel safe and secure.

He is probably not looking for motivation or validation. What we might see as intrusive, he might see as "the truth" to guide his friends and family. Maybe he is just giving advice from his heart.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I really think his intentions are in the right place. You might cut him some slack. He does care about his private circle.
'
 
Last edited:

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
32,010
Reaction score
32,995
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
Hmmmmm .... a label I would wear proudly.

Rules are good --- that way you know where you stand and how that vehicle coming at you at 60 MPH would hit you at a combined speed of 120MPH if you are driving at the same speed, but something failed or fell off - whatever!

Knowing that they are driving a safe-rated vehicle is reassuring as long as everybody plays in the same ballpark.

The problem with rules is that they create a monster through legislation that just grows and grows and generates a lot of dislike among the players. This is a human - albeit: perverted - way of wielding power - and with power comes corrupted cash flow.

With corrupted cash flow comes anger among the users, and that's where the wheels fall off. Standards are good, though --- think of the testing of brake material and the steel holding the ball joints together and the rubber sealing dirt out and oil in.

If there were no standards - we'd be driving potential deathtraps - both to ourselves and everybody else we face on the highway.



I know that different people see things in different ways. Everyone has different experiences to build their worldview. For all we know, he is just using his experiences as a guidepost to help people he considers his confidants and friends feel safe and secure.

He is probably not looking for motivation or validation. What we might see as intrusive, he might see as "the truth" to guide his friends and family. Maybe he is just giving advice from his heart.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I really think his intentions are in the right place. You might cut him some slack. He does care about his private circle.
'

Well, dang. I saw you were here and had posted and I got excited because I am legitimately wondering how you answer my questions. But you are just beating around the bush so far.

So how does one of those old style brake controllers use a larger volume of fluid than two rear brake cylinders on rear drum brakes that are just ever so slightly out of adjustment?

Can you provide us with a copy or link to the law that states they are illegal for use on a dual circuit brake system?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
45,678
Posts
989,308
Members
38,780
Latest member
jacksonforq
Top