How to tell roller cam or not

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

78C10BigTen

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2017
Posts
15,598
Reaction score
24,035
Location
pennsylvannia
First Name
Ted
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
C10 BIG TEN
Engine Size
350
You can look at it like this too, pretty much everyone went roller now and have gas engines going over 300k flat tapper is hard pressed to make it to 200k. Not saying impossible but with today’s crap oil not likely.
Not sure whats in my 94 burban but shes been beaten the whole 8 years ive had it and its past 300k with lil to no issues.
 

rpcraft

Full Access Member
Joined
May 31, 2016
Posts
1,330
Reaction score
509
Location
Texas
First Name
Robert
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
Jimmy
Engine Size
LS 6.0 364 CID
That I am aware none of the truck motors came with a stock roller rocker/cam setup until the L31 Vortec 5.7 motors, I think around 1995 or so. I believe what happens is a lot of guys see the center bolt valve covers on the junk TBI motors and confuse it with a Vortec roller block. Wishful thinking as it may be pretty much any truck motor that had those TBI heads was never a roller rocker until someone put a roller rocker in it, and unfortunately if they put those old "swirl port" heads back on then it was a waste of money and a roller rocker, aside from the extended wear of the cam and lifters (which would be like more of a curse than a gift). I may be mistaken but I think those heads were such junk that they never even made an intake to throw them on a roller motor with the Vortec 5.7 FI still intact.
 

twinturbo427

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2014
Posts
622
Reaction score
700
Location
Florida
First Name
Phil
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
Suburban
Engine Size
350
Not sure whats in my 94 burban but shes been beaten the whole 8 years ive had it and its past 300k with lil to no issues.

You must be super lucky. Late 94 and all of 95 saw a spike in engines replaced under warranty. Most had spun main bearings, rod bearings, and unusually high wear.
 

yevgenievich

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2014
Posts
4,789
Reaction score
3,327
Location
Texas
First Name
Viktor
Truck Year
sad
Truck Model
very sad
Engine Size
less sad
You must be super lucky. Late 94 and all of 95 saw a spike in engines replaced under warranty. Most had spun main bearings, rod bearings, and unusually high wear.
interesting as my 94 one ton has 260k miles on it. Wonder if the motor has been replaced before, but it seem to be all stock.
I did have 88 one ton before with a stock 454 pushing 300k miles as well(290k when I sold it)
 

fussfeld

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2013
Posts
340
Reaction score
54
Location
east coast
First Name
j
Truck Year
83
Truck Model
c-10
Engine Size
4.3 v-6 262CID
That I am aware none of the truck motors came with a stock roller rocker/cam setup until the L31 Vortec 5.7 motors, I think around 1995 or so. I believe what happens is a lot of guys see the center bolt valve covers on the junk TBI motors and confuse it with a Vortec roller block. Wishful thinking as it may be pretty much any truck motor that had those TBI heads was never a roller rocker until someone put a roller rocker in it, and unfortunately if they put those old "swirl port" heads back on then it was a waste of money and a roller rocker, aside from the extended wear of the cam and lifters (which would be like more of a curse than a gift). I may be mistaken but I think those heads were such junk that they never even made an intake to throw them on a roller motor with the Vortec 5.7 FI still intact.

Pretty sure the v-6 truck engines DID get rollers from 87 on up.

My theory is because they had so many v-8 flat lifters and v-8 flat lifter cams left over that it was cheaper to keep using them. Whereas the 4.3 had only been out for like 2 or 3 years at that point and thus it was just as cheap to come up with a new roller cam. But that is just a theory and it's strange how the 6 got it first in trucks vs. the 8. Seems like it should have been the other way around?
 

twinturbo427

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2014
Posts
622
Reaction score
700
Location
Florida
First Name
Phil
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
Suburban
Engine Size
350
interesting as my 94 one ton has 260k miles on it. Wonder if the motor has been replaced before, but it seem to be all stock.
I did have 88 one ton before with a stock 454 pushing 300k miles as well(290k when I sold it)

Probably a sign of the attention to maintenance and being cared for that gets that longetivity.

I pulled apart several 200k+ mile 454s from commercial vehicles and a few were spotless inside, many were normal wear, and some were slap worn out. Always amazed at how different they could be. Fuel injected engines were always cleaner inside than carbureted.
 

rpcraft

Full Access Member
Joined
May 31, 2016
Posts
1,330
Reaction score
509
Location
Texas
First Name
Robert
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
Jimmy
Engine Size
LS 6.0 364 CID
The 4.3 v6 was in sqaurebodies at least as early as 1985, but probably even earlier. I know because my dad had a 1985 c10 with one.
 

yevgenievich

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2014
Posts
4,789
Reaction score
3,327
Location
Texas
First Name
Viktor
Truck Year
sad
Truck Model
very sad
Engine Size
less sad
The big block one was absolutely not cared for that I could tell. For some reason I painted it before selling.
Probably a sign of the attention to maintenance and being cared for that gets that longetivity.

I pulled apart several 200k+ mile 454s from commercial vehicles and a few were spotless inside, many were normal wear, and some were slap worn out. Always amazed at how different they could be. Fuel injected engines were always cleaner inside than carbureted.

You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach
 
Last edited:

CSFJ

-----------------
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Posts
6,160
Reaction score
5,162
Location
------
First Name
-------------
Truck Year
-------
Truck Model
-------
Engine Size
-------
The 4.3 v6 was in sqaurebodies at least as early as 1985, but probably even earlier. I know because my dad had a 1985 c10 with one.


I believe '85 was the first year. The Astro vans may have had it earlier (not sure on their production dates)
 

rpcraft

Full Access Member
Joined
May 31, 2016
Posts
1,330
Reaction score
509
Location
Texas
First Name
Robert
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
Jimmy
Engine Size
LS 6.0 364 CID
Yeah and that little 4.3 was a beast of a motor in the light trucks, Astro vans, and S-10/1-15 trucks and blazers too. I recall my dad towing me in my ranger once with a really short chain and it had no problems doing 80 down the interestate. it scared the hell out of me but I guess he figured I had it handled well enough.
 

78C10BigTen

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2017
Posts
15,598
Reaction score
24,035
Location
pennsylvannia
First Name
Ted
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
C10 BIG TEN
Engine Size
350
You can look at it like this too, pretty much everyone went roller now and have gas engines going over 300k flat tapper is hard pressed to make it to 200k. Not saying impossible but with today’s crap oil not likely.
There ya go. Mine made it over 200 lol

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Forum statistics

Threads
42,158
Posts
910,270
Members
33,654
Latest member
theshawnR
Top