2014 Silverado Announced

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Mikiepa

Junior Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2012
Posts
29
Reaction score
1
Location
Henryville,IN
First Name
Michael
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
V20
Engine Size
350
All I can say is EPIC FAIL, what has GM done now? This has got to be one of the ugliest damn silverados built only being topped by the 2003-2007 models.
 

Attachments

  • 2014-silverado-model-overview-exterior-cnt-well-1-648x316-01.jpg
    2014-silverado-model-overview-exterior-cnt-well-1-648x316-01.jpg
    63.9 KB · Views: 157

Driver4r

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Posts
3,087
Reaction score
40
Location
Nebraska
First Name
Trevor
Truck Year
76,74
Truck Model
k10,c20
Engine Size
355/th350/np203, 454/th350/ff-rear
All I can say is EPIC FAIL, what has GM done now? This has got to be one of the ugliest damn silverados built only being topped by the 2003-2007 models.

they should go back to the 73-87 look :D
 

Old77

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Posts
28,265
Reaction score
8,740
Location
Kansas City, Mo
First Name
Jacob
Truck Year
1977/1990/1991
Truck Model
C10 longbed/R1500 Burb/R3500 Dually
Engine Size
350/350/454
We've already posted about this in the Convo thread :D
 

Old77

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Posts
28,265
Reaction score
8,740
Location
Kansas City, Mo
First Name
Jacob
Truck Year
1977/1990/1991
Truck Model
C10 longbed/R1500 Burb/R3500 Dually
Engine Size
350/350/454
You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Old77

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Posts
28,265
Reaction score
8,740
Location
Kansas City, Mo
First Name
Jacob
Truck Year
1977/1990/1991
Truck Model
C10 longbed/R1500 Burb/R3500 Dually
Engine Size
350/350/454
You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach



saw these renderings posted on another website...
You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach
 

89Suburban

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Posts
24,541
Reaction score
5,846
Location
Southeast PA
First Name
Paw Paw
Truck Year
2007
Truck Model
Chevrolet Tahoe LT
Engine Size
5.3, 4WD
I am not digging the GMC LED surround headlight crap going on there but otherwise they look ok to me?. Thing I can't understand why they make these newer trucks sit so high in the air.
 

Old77

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Posts
28,265
Reaction score
8,740
Location
Kansas City, Mo
First Name
Jacob
Truck Year
1977/1990/1991
Truck Model
C10 longbed/R1500 Burb/R3500 Dually
Engine Size
350/350/454
I am not digging the GMC LED surround headlight crap going on there but otherwise they look ok to me?. Thing I can't understand why they make these newer trucks sit so high in the air.

It's so that they can claim better ground clearance over Ford so that they aren't completely making things up in those commercials of them scaling large rocks :lol:

The more I look at them the more it's growing on me. We shall see once they start hitting the lots.
 

Stroked

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2011
Posts
2,248
Reaction score
88
Location
Beloit, Kansas
First Name
Jared
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
305
I like em! Definitely an improvement over the current body style. And it's about time they offered the crew cab with a 6'6" box.

And they need to make them sit higher. You should be able to drive over a curb stop without dragging your bumper. :disgust:
 

Mikiepa

Junior Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2012
Posts
29
Reaction score
1
Location
Henryville,IN
First Name
Michael
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
V20
Engine Size
350
I like em! Definitely an improvement over the current body style. And it's about time they offered the crew cab with a 6'6" box.

And they need to make them sit higher. You should be able to drive over a curb stop without dragging your bumper. :disgust:


Agreed, a truck is no better than a car if it doesnt have more clearance. They need to sit high and level!
 

kleedus

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2012
Posts
1,726
Reaction score
149
Location
wyo
First Name
Ray
Truck Year
1960 threw 91
Truck Model
c10 to k30
Engine Size
350 threw 454
gm has not built a truck since 1987 (91 for subs blazers and crews) that i would buy for looks alone.

i think the gm enginers need to be fired and a new group brought in to redesign all of gm's cars and trucks.

the new camaro is the ugliest thin i have ever seen and this silverado is a close second.

i am a die hard chevy guy but as far as looks for new trucks dodge has been kicking chevy's ass for a couple years now.

gm better quit trying to make trucks built like cadillacs and start building a real truck or they are going to need bailed out again.
 

Old77

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Posts
28,265
Reaction score
8,740
Location
Kansas City, Mo
First Name
Jacob
Truck Year
1977/1990/1991
Truck Model
C10 longbed/R1500 Burb/R3500 Dually
Engine Size
350/350/454
I guess it's a matter of opinion because if we're just talking about ugly the New Ford trucks blow ugly out of the water! The Dodge's don't look terrible but I don't think the GM trucks are any worse than the Dodge in the looks department and I hate the Dodge interiors.
 

Stroked

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2011
Posts
2,248
Reaction score
88
Location
Beloit, Kansas
First Name
Jared
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
305
the new camaro is the ugliest thin i have ever seen and this silverado is a close second.

i am a die hard chevy guy but as far as looks for new trucks dodge has been kicking chevy's ass for a couple years now.

I'll agree with you on the Dodge looking better, but I absolutely love the look of new Camaro. :drool: The interior could use a little work though.


I guess it's a matter of opinion because if we're just talking about ugly the New Ford trucks blow ugly out of the water! The Dodge's don't look terrible but I don't think the GM trucks are any worse than the Dodge in the looks department and I hate the Dodge interiors.

Wha?? :( The interior is half the reason I bought my Dodge over a Chevy. Lol.
 

8T6K5

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Posts
1,128
Reaction score
112
Location
AZ
First Name
Jerry
Truck Year
1986
Truck Model
K5
Engine Size
L98 350 TPI
If I were to buy a new truck today....Tundra. Loved my 07' 2500HD, just don't care for them now.
 

Mikiepa

Junior Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2012
Posts
29
Reaction score
1
Location
Henryville,IN
First Name
Michael
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
V20
Engine Size
350
I hate Dodges stubby anorexic crew cab and funeral door crew cab models. Those are the ugliest things ever. Fords standard cab edition is odd with the small door and misplaced window on the side.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
42,206
Posts
911,305
Members
33,701
Latest member
Rotti_rancher
Top