255/60/15 vs 275/60/15

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

KBinc

Junior Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2024
Posts
2
Reaction score
1
Location
South Dakota
First Name
Kent
Truck Year
1982
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
staright 6
Hello! I’m new here and would appreciate the feedback. I have an 1982 square body short box and I’m debating on staggering 255/60/15 up front and a 275/60/15 in the rear, of just going with a 275/60/15 all around. I have stock rally wheels and I’m going with a Mickey Thompson Sportsman S/T, white letters out all around. If anyone has any feedback or pros and cons or pictures of their setup in these sizes I’d greatly appreciate you sending them my way. Thanks!!
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
32,187
Reaction score
33,690
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
I run the very same tire size combo, but on my Chevelle. The tires were actually purchased to use on my C10, but the Chevelle was in much more of a need for tires.

You must be registered for see images attach
You must be registered for see images attach
 

Ricko1966

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2017
Posts
6,928
Reaction score
11,925
Location
kansas
First Name
Rick
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
c20
Engine Size
350
I'd run the 255s on all four corners 2nd choice would be the 275s on all four corners,reason being you can rotate them,a spare would be same front or rear and 20mm stagger isn't that big of a difference. 275s are going to be a little harder on steering components and frame.
 

SQ HAF KRU

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2022
Posts
52
Reaction score
107
Location
Surprise, AZ
First Name
Greg
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
1/2 Ton Crew Cab
Engine Size
Gen V LS 5.3
Its all about you....what do you really like.....I'm a fat and skinny guy.....its just me, some like all 4 corners the same.....I do have a site I use Tiresize.com...I enjoy it, you can select 2 sizes, and they compare them for height, width, and diameter....the diameter deal really helps on late model vehicles....so you don't stray to far from OE and effect speedo much...try its fun...keep pics coming of your build
 

Johnny Atomic

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Posts
133
Reaction score
289
Location
Little Rock AR
First Name
Johnny
Truck Year
1983
Truck Model
Sierra Classic 1500
Engine Size
350
Hello! I’m new here and would appreciate the feedback. I have an 1982 square body short box and I’m debating on staggering 255/60/15 up front and a 275/60/15 in the rear, of just going with a 275/60/15 all around. I have stock rally wheels and I’m going with a Mickey Thompson Sportsman S/T, white letters out all around. If anyone has any feedback or pros and cons or pictures of their setup in these sizes I’d greatly appreciate you sending them my way. Thanks!!
here's what 255/60r15 looks like all the way around at stock ride height.
 

Attachments

  • 7504680B-DD35-4B25-B864-B8FB397AE989.jpeg
    7504680B-DD35-4B25-B864-B8FB397AE989.jpeg
    229.1 KB · Views: 24

Grit dog

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
7,927
Reaction score
14,133
Location
Auburn, Washington
First Name
Todd
Truck Year
1986, 1977
Truck Model
K20, C10
Engine Size
454, 350
I'd run the 255s on all four corners 2nd choice would be the 275s on all four corners,reason being you can rotate them,a spare would be same front or rear and 20mm stagger isn't that big of a difference. 275s are going to be a little harder on steering components and frame.
Certainly the most fiscally responsible approach. Especially if it’s going be a high miles daily that you’re wearing out tires on. But for a cruiser/ Sunday go meetin truck, achieving the look may be more important at not much or any extra cost.
Although when I did the staggered setup on the 77, the 255s cost more than the 275s!!
To the OP, if you do go staggered width, decide whether you want them to look the same diameter or not. If you do both widths 60 series the rears will be slightly taller. Also a cool look, just mentioning it.
I did fat and skinny with different wheel offsets front and rear, but not big n little.
 

Finkaire

Finkaire
Joined
Dec 28, 2021
Posts
505
Reaction score
881
Location
California
First Name
Loren
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
Silverado c10
Engine Size
305
275/60/15’s all around
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0812.jpeg
    IMG_0812.jpeg
    175.3 KB · Views: 22

Finkaire

Finkaire
Joined
Dec 28, 2021
Posts
505
Reaction score
881
Location
California
First Name
Loren
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
Silverado c10
Engine Size
305
I saw these, looked to fill the wheelwells. 265/75/15’s if I blow up the picture, could be 255’s
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6786.jpeg
    IMG_6786.jpeg
    196.3 KB · Views: 22

MikeB

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Posts
1,808
Reaction score
1,066
Location
North Texas -- California escapee
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1969
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
355
I think 255-60 tires look short on a pickup, unless it's lowered quite a lot. And 275-60s are a bit wider than optimal for an 8" wheel. I personally prefer a 255-70s on 8" wheels, like in the photo below. If I had a do-over, I'd go to 17" wheels with ~29" tall tires.

But, as we used to say, it's whatever floats your boat!

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Attachments

  • 1748875842365.png
    1748875842365.png
    1 MB · Views: 13

Scruffy49

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2025
Posts
82
Reaction score
62
Location
Rosemark TN
First Name
Jeff
Truck Year
1985
Truck Model
C10 swb
Engine Size
4.3L
Width is determined by your wheels… 2wd rally wheels were 15x 6, 7 or 8 inch. My 85 swb shipped with 15x6 van rally wheels and P205/75r15s. Had P215/75s on all 4 corners for years, and then LT235/75s.
Since it is now a toy, right down to having a permanent “antique” plate… P215/70s and P235/75, car tread up front, all terrain rears. Both are “XL” rated, extra load, which basically means for large rwd cars. Truck no longer has a receiver hitch, switching out the step bumper for a sport bumper.
Run a tire size/brand/style that you can replace at any Walmart, Sams, Costco or chain tire shop. If you pop a tire out in BFE, having to order and overnight something is a pita.
 

ChuckN

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2022
Posts
1,624
Reaction score
5,406
Location
Bellinham, WA
First Name
Chad
Truck Year
1981
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
350
Hello! I’m new here and would appreciate the feedback. I have an 1982 square body short box and I’m debating on staggering 255/60/15 up front and a 275/60/15 in the rear, of just going with a 275/60/15 all around. I have stock rally wheels and I’m going with a Mickey Thompson Sportsman S/T, white letters out all around. If anyone has any feedback or pros and cons or pictures of their setup in these sizes I’d greatly appreciate you sending them my way. Thanks!!
Welcome! Post up a pic if you haven’t already!

As others have mentioned, it’s all personal preference vs fiscal. Throw in a dash of consideration of rear end gear.

On the lowered trucks, the 255/275 combination looks good to me. When I got mine and wasn’t lowered yet, it had 275/60 all the way around. I wasn’t a huge fan. Looking through this thread, on a non-lowered truck, the 255/70 that @MikeB posted look great to me.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
45,934
Posts
996,339
Members
39,135
Latest member
1979CJ7
Top