Rear disc brakes on my 87 v20

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

dajn37

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Posts
290
Reaction score
220
Location
Minnesota
First Name
David
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
R10 scottsdale
Engine Size
305
I started this conversion awhile back. I have searched and read a few threads about these conversions. My understanding is the proportioning valve needs to be changed due to the difference between drum and disc. Is that correct? I just thought I would start a thread about it and report progress. The conversion was simple. I have everything on and have bled the brakes but the pickup is still along way from road worthy so we will see how it goes. Once the weather gets halfway decent i am going to focus most of my efforts too getting my 3/4ton road worthy. I have had it over 2 years now and still haven't got it ready for the road. Just get to busy and sidetracked. I also put new shocks on the back and changed the rear differential oil while doing the swap.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

dajn37

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Posts
290
Reaction score
220
Location
Minnesota
First Name
David
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
R10 scottsdale
Engine Size
305
Another pic. Apparently that's the only two I took.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Frankenchevy

Proverbs 16:18
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Posts
5,904
Reaction score
7,249
Location
USA
First Name
Jeremy
Truck Year
Square
Truck Model
CUCV
Engine Size
Small
I ordered a disc / disc prop valve from summit. Can’t tell you the exact p/n, but it’s probably in my build thread somewhere.

From what I’ve gathered, the drum prop valve keeps more residual pressure than the disc caliper wants and can cause your rear rotor to warp. Besides the other pressure and volume differences between the two.

I can’t report as of yet on the new setup, except that the pedal pressure is firm—even without the hydro boost going.
 

77 K20

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2012
Posts
3,075
Reaction score
3,044
Location
Montana
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1977
Truck Model
K20 5" lift
Engine Size
HT383 fuel injected
First of all in your picture your bleed screw is pointed down. You won't be able to get the air out of the system well like that.

I researched and researched the whole rear disc brake thing. Seems there is no one "right" way to do it. Some used all stock components- and claimed it worked fine. Others had issues of rear lockup, no rear brakes... pretty much every possible outcome and I was more confused than before.

I tried all stock- had rear brake lockup. Bought a disc/disc master cylinder (actually 2 different ones- didn't like either). Rear brake lockup. Then bought an inline proportional valve- and now I can adjust it down where it brakes pretty evenly. Then went back to just a regular stock master cylinder. I like that pedal feel the best.

Try what you have first, use your hand or an IR thermometer to see if your rear brakes are dragging and then do some panic stops on gravel and see what it does. Then go from there if you don't like it.
 

Snoots

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Posts
8,158
Reaction score
15,957
Location
Georgia
First Name
Roger
Truck Year
1973
Truck Model
Jimmy Sierra
Engine Size
350
First of all in your picture your bleed screw is pointed down. You won't be able to get the air out of the system well like that.

X2!
And Frankenchevy is right on about the Proportioning Valve. You HAVE to change it too. No 'ifs or ands' or it'll bite you in the butt.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
28,956
Reaction score
23,465
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
First of all in your picture your bleed screw is pointed down. You won't be able to get the air out of the system well like that.

I researched and researched the whole rear disc brake thing. Seems there is no one "right" way to do it. Some used all stock components- and claimed it worked fine. Others had issues of rear lockup, no rear brakes... pretty much every possible outcome and I was more confused than before.

I tried all stock- had rear brake lockup. Bought a disc/disc master cylinder (actually 2 different ones- didn't like either). Rear brake lockup. Then bought an inline proportional valve- and now I can adjust it down where it brakes pretty evenly. Then went back to just a regular stock master cylinder. I like that pedal feel the best.

Try what you have first, use your hand or an IR thermometer to see if your rear brakes are dragging and then do some panic stops on gravel and see what it does. Then go from there if you don't like it.

Do you know the bore size of your current master cylinder? Running the adjustable valve in the rear circuit, did you also delete the original prop valve from the front X-member?
 

dajn37

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Posts
290
Reaction score
220
Location
Minnesota
First Name
David
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
R10 scottsdale
Engine Size
305
First of all in your picture your bleed screw is pointed down. You won't be able to get the air out of the system well like that.

I researched and researched the whole rear disc brake thing. Seems there is no one "right" way to do it. Some used all stock components- and claimed it worked fine. Others had issues of rear lockup, no rear brakes... pretty much every possible outcome and I was more confused than before.

I tried all stock- had rear brake lockup. Bought a disc/disc master cylinder (actually 2 different ones- didn't like either). Rear brake lockup. Then bought an inline proportional valve- and now I can adjust it down where it brakes pretty evenly. Then went back to just a regular stock master cylinder. I like that pedal feel the best.

Try what you have first, use your hand or an IR thermometer to see if your rear brakes are dragging and then do some panic stops on gravel and see what it does. Then go from there if you don't like it.
That's correct. Now I remember that being my first picture and apparantly my only pic I took. I just had to rotate everything. I will take new ones when I get it in the garage when the weather gets better. I had it together wrong the first go. I forgot about that. Like I say I kind of put the v20 on the back burner the last year
 
Last edited:

77 K20

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2012
Posts
3,075
Reaction score
3,044
Location
Montana
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1977
Truck Model
K20 5" lift
Engine Size
HT383 fuel injected
Do you know the bore size of your current master cylinder? Running the adjustable valve in the rear circuit, did you also delete the original prop valve from the front X-member?

I ended up buying a disc/disc prop valve to replace the stock prop valve. It didn't help much. Still had rear brake lockup even on pavement. The prop valve I bought was a Right Stuff Detailing PV72 Disc Brake Proportioning Valve. This didn't work so I had to add a Baer adjustable proportional valve after it for the rear brakes.

You must be registered for see images attach


The first MC I used was a ACDelco 18M1887. Ordered this because someone else said it "worked awesome" and was for a vehicle with front/rear discs. Very hard pedal feel because the cylinder was a 1.3385826772". The reservoir was so large it hit the vacuum line connection for the brake booster.

You must be registered for see images attach


And I believe with this MC it had the port sizes reversed... so I had to swap the brake lines around to hook them up. The lid never properly sealed- as soon as the truck would bounce around brake fluid would start seeping out from the huge lid. So I went to the "corvette disc/disc MC" that SO many said worked awesome. It was the ACDelco 18M91. Bore size: 1.125" This one no matter how well I bled the brakes had a very soft brake feel with a long brake pedal travel. Didn't like the feel of it at all. Used this for a few years and finally had enough of it. Ordered a ACDelco 18M92. Bore size: 1.25" If I remember right this is the right MC for a truck of my year but with the larger rear drum option. So I was able to put the brake lines back to the original spots on the MC. The brake pedal feel is great- firm, but not too firm.

Like I said- I was SO annoyed at this whole thing due to how many posts I found online that completely opposite of what someone else said that worked. And since I am no expert I consulted and did all the work with my friend who has been a certifed GM mechanic since the late 80's. The work was done correctly.

So best thing I can say is just try it and see what you think. Then modify from there if you feel the need.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
28,956
Reaction score
23,465
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
I ended up buying a disc/disc prop valve to replace the stock prop valve. It didn't help much. Still had rear brake lockup even on pavement. The prop valve I bought was a Right Stuff Detailing PV72 Disc Brake Proportioning Valve. This didn't work so I had to add a Baer adjustable proportional valve after it for the rear brakes.

You must be registered for see images attach


The first MC I used was a ACDelco 18M1887. Ordered this because someone else said it "worked awesome" and was for a vehicle with front/rear discs. Very hard pedal feel because the cylinder was a 1.3385826772". The reservoir was so large it hit the vacuum line connection for the brake booster.

You must be registered for see images attach


And I believe with this MC it had the port sizes reversed... so I had to swap the brake lines around to hook them up. The lid never properly sealed- as soon as the truck would bounce around brake fluid would start seeping out from the huge lid. So I went to the "corvette disc/disc MC" that SO many said worked awesome. It was the ACDelco 18M91. Bore size: 1.125" This one no matter how well I bled the brakes had a very soft brake feel with a long brake pedal travel. Didn't like the feel of it at all. Used this for a few years and finally had enough of it. Ordered a ACDelco 18M92. Bore size: 1.25" If I remember right this is the right MC for a truck of my year but with the larger rear drum option. So I was able to put the brake lines back to the original spots on the MC. The brake pedal feel is great- firm, but not too firm.

Like I said- I was SO annoyed at this whole thing due to how many posts I found online that completely opposite of what someone else said that worked. And since I am no expert I consulted and did all the work with my friend who has been a certifed GM mechanic since the late 80's. The work was done correctly.

So best thing I can say is just try it and see what you think. Then modify from there if you feel the need.

Good info! I'll stick with the stock cylinder in my Burb then, it's got the 1.25 for the 13 inch drums. I'll just use the stock prop valve too, and put an adjustable valve on the rear circuit.

What might throw me a curve ball is I'll end up with the big 1-ton calipers up front. My JB7 front calipers will just get moved to the rear. I suspect the pedal feel might wind up a bit softer than yours.
 

dajn37

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Posts
290
Reaction score
220
Location
Minnesota
First Name
David
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
R10 scottsdale
Engine Size
305
I ended up buying a disc/disc prop valve to replace the stock prop valve. It didn't help much. Still had rear brake lockup even on pavement. The prop valve I bought was a Right Stuff Detailing PV72 Disc Brake Proportioning Valve. This didn't work so I had to add a Baer adjustable proportional valve after it for the rear brakes.

You must be registered for see images attach


The first MC I used was a ACDelco 18M1887. Ordered this because someone else said it "worked awesome" and was for a vehicle with front/rear discs. Very hard pedal feel because the cylinder was a 1.3385826772". The reservoir was so large it hit the vacuum line connection for the brake booster.

You must be registered for see images attach


And I believe with this MC it had the port sizes reversed... so I had to swap the brake lines around to hook them up. The lid never properly sealed- as soon as the truck would bounce around brake fluid would start seeping out from the huge lid. So I went to the "corvette disc/disc MC" that SO many said worked awesome. It was the ACDelco 18M91. Bore size: 1.125" This one no matter how well I bled the brakes had a very soft brake feel with a long brake pedal travel. Didn't like the feel of it at all. Used this for a few years and finally had enough of it. Ordered a ACDelco 18M92. Bore size: 1.25" If I remember right this is the right MC for a truck of my year but with the larger rear drum option. So I was able to put the brake lines back to the original spots on the MC. The brake pedal feel is great- firm, but not too firm.

Like I said- I was SO annoyed at this whole thing due to how many posts I found online that completely opposite of what someone else said that worked. And since I am no expert I consulted and did all the work with my friend who has been a certifed GM mechanic since the late 80's. The work was done correctly.

So best thing I can say is just try it and see what you think. Then modify from there if you feel the need.
I appreciate that. Thanks.
 

Derick C.

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2014
Posts
824
Reaction score
1,574
Location
Auburn WA
First Name
Derick
Truck Year
1990
Truck Model
1500
Engine Size
454/700r4
You must be registered for see images attach


I just did a 14 bolt full float axle swap with disc brake conversion on my 90 burb.
My burb does not have a proportioning valve on the cross member like yours and the valve I ordered doesn't look anything like what I have directly under the master cyl.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
28,956
Reaction score
23,465
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
You must be registered for see images attach


I just did a 14 bolt full float axle swap with disc brake conversion on my 90 burb.
My burb does not have a proportioning valve on the cross member like yours and the valve I ordered doesn't look anything like what I have directly under the master cyl.

'90 and '91 had rear ABS and they had the proportioning done near the master cylinder. It was a different type of prop valve.

You can simply delete the prop valve and run an adjustable valve on the rear line to adjust the brake bias. I had a '90 Burb setup that way.
 

HotRodPC

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
47,008
Reaction score
8,972
Location
OKC, OK
First Name
HotRod
Truck Year
85 K20 LWB
Truck Model
Silverado
Engine Size
454 - Turbo 400 - 3.73
'90 and '91 had rear ABS and they had the proportioning done near the master cylinder. It was a different type of prop valve.

You can simply delete the prop valve and run an adjustable valve on the rear line to adjust the brake bias. I had a '90 Burb setup that way.
Jep, he beat me to it. Rear ONLY ABS, not 4 wheel. So you have the toothed wheel on your Ring gear which is the wheel speed sensor.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
28,956
Reaction score
23,465
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
Jep, he beat me to it. Rear ONLY ABS, not 4 wheel. So you have the toothed wheel on your Ring gear which is the wheel speed sensor.

I think the toothed ring was just a B-body thing. The trucks just used the VSS as the rear wheel speed sensor, since that was it's job already and the system wasn't advanced enough to need individual wheel sensors.
 

HotRodPC

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
47,008
Reaction score
8,972
Location
OKC, OK
First Name
HotRod
Truck Year
85 K20 LWB
Truck Model
Silverado
Engine Size
454 - Turbo 400 - 3.73
I think the toothed ring was just a B-body thing. The trucks just used the VSS as the rear wheel speed sensor, since that was it's job already and the system wasn't advanced enough to need individual wheel sensors.
I could have swore I've seen the toothed wheel on a 90 or 91 before.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
41,847
Posts
903,382
Members
33,361
Latest member
iiixtremeiii
Top