73 C20 front brake issue, The right front caliper will not retract, causing the wheel to almost lock.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Goldie Driver

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Posts
4,378
Reaction score
7,563
Location
Houston, Texas
First Name
Britt
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
GMC K1500 Suburban
Engine Size
350
Yup, Keith is correct. So in this application the forward reservoir is for front brakes. That is the first place to look for a leak.

Went and looked at the '79. Sho 'nuff.

You must be registered for see images attach


Pardon the mess
Please define forward. That set up is like mine and the big line in the front (forward) part of the master cylinder feeds the rears.
 

Keith Seymore

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Posts
3,910
Reaction score
13,993
Location
Motor City
First Name
Keith Seymore
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
R10
Engine Size
4.3L
Doesn't matter.

The large reservoir always feeds the front discs, regardless of how it is positioned. The small reservoir works the drums, because less fluid is required for the wheel cylinders.

It's the only way it can work.

K
 

Goldie Driver

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Posts
4,378
Reaction score
7,563
Location
Houston, Texas
First Name
Britt
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
GMC K1500 Suburban
Engine Size
350
Doesn't matter.

The large reservoir always feeds the front discs, regardless of how it is positioned. The small reservoir works the drums, because less fluid is required for the wheel cylinders.

It's the only way it can work.

K
Why does the drum side use a larger line diameter? That logic puzzles me.

Thanks !
 

Keith Seymore

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Posts
3,910
Reaction score
13,993
Location
Motor City
First Name
Keith Seymore
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
R10
Engine Size
4.3L
I do not know. My Chevelle was the same way.

When I converted to manual brakes I made them both the same size, for convenience sake.

Pressure is pressure, and exerts the same force on all sides of the vessel regardless of diameter.

Maybe idiot proofing, so they don't get confused in the assembly plant?

K
 

Ricko1966

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2017
Posts
10,082
Reaction score
19,426
Location
kansas
First Name
Rick
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
c20
Engine Size
350
I do not know. My Chevelle was the same way.

When I converted to manual brakes I made them both the same size, for convenience sake.

Pressure is pressure, and exerts the same force on all sides of the vessel regardless of diameter.

Maybe idiot proofing, so they don't get confused in the assembly plant?

K
Larger diameter means more volume,maybe the difference is to reduce time to overcome the standoff valve. Engineers look at milliseconds,us dummies don't know how. EDIT when I said dummies I meant me.
 
Last edited:

Grit dog

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
9,507
Reaction score
17,443
Location
The Right side of Washington
First Name
Todd
Truck Year
1986, 1977
Truck Model
K20, C10
Engine Size
454, 350
Pretty universal. Bigger reservoir and bigger brake line = front. Also not hard to visually trace to verify.
 

Radiohead

That guy on the Columbia
Joined
Mar 17, 2022
Posts
3,139
Reaction score
10,152
Location
Low Earth Orbit where it's safer
First Name
Eric
Truck Year
MCMLXXIX
Truck Model
C-20 Silverado Camper Special
Engine Size
454 crazy cubes, or 7.4 luscious litres
But the reservoirs are the same volume.
 

Goldie Driver

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Posts
4,378
Reaction score
7,563
Location
Houston, Texas
First Name
Britt
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
GMC K1500 Suburban
Engine Size
350
Pretty universal. Bigger reservoir and bigger brake line = front. Also not hard to visually trace to verify.
Oh, so close.
Bigger reservoir = front Brakes. Bigger line on my square(cast iron square reservoirs as a whole ?) = rears.

:patriot:
 
Last edited:

Goldie Driver

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Posts
4,378
Reaction score
7,563
Location
Houston, Texas
First Name
Britt
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
GMC K1500 Suburban
Engine Size
350

Radiohead

That guy on the Columbia
Joined
Mar 17, 2022
Posts
3,139
Reaction score
10,152
Location
Low Earth Orbit where it's safer
First Name
Eric
Truck Year
MCMLXXIX
Truck Model
C-20 Silverado Camper Special
Engine Size
454 crazy cubes, or 7.4 luscious litres
But the reservoirs are the same volume.
A ha ha ha ha ha, not so fast self. They are not the same. Had a sunny 50° day today, so it was time to finish up the brake rubber program. Of course the painted master cylinder was bled and installed as well. Now since I am eternally curious, as part of the gravity bleed for the front half, I took note of which part went down and.... [drum roll please] the half closest to the booster lost level. I'm confused as to what I had originally said and without looking to see, I'm just going to amend any brain flatulence I may have broadcast.
You must be registered for see images attach

The paint still hasn't fully cured. Note to self, don't use engine paint in the PNW winter unless one is fully prepared to heat up the article to evaporate the solvent in a timely manner. Lol.


So there you go. The three hoses are here
You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach

These are Delco branded hoses, and both fronts required a bit of massaging to get the area for the banjo bolt to sit in the proper aspect off the caliper to not run into suspension components. Not impossible, but ffs, why couldn't they get the bends right before hand. Lazy crap, but I made them work. Also, the passenger side fitting at the frame end was clocked wrong with the one way hole. Managed to change the control arm clamp positioning enough to make it work, but there's still a weird dip in how it is routed. Time will tell if the hose will accept the odd torsional, I don't like it.


In case you've never looked inside a front brake hose, here's a view of what you're missing. Easy to see how one can plug with little effort.
You must be registered for see images attach

It looks way smaller in real life. Never clamp a rubber line when removing a caliper, way too easy to crush the rubber and ruin it.
 

Ricko1966

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2017
Posts
10,082
Reaction score
19,426
Location
kansas
First Name
Rick
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
c20
Engine Size
350
A ha ha ha ha ha, not so fast self. They are not the same. Had a sunny 50° day today, so it was time to finish up the brake rubber program. Of course the painted master cylinder was bled and installed as well. Now since I am eternally curious, as part of the gravity bleed for the front half, I took note of which part went down and.... [drum roll please] the half closest to the booster lost level. I'm confused as to what I had originally said and without looking to see, I'm just going to amend any brain flatulence I may have broadcast.
You must be registered for see images attach

The paint still hasn't fully cured. Note to self, don't use engine paint in the PNW winter unless one is fully prepared to heat up the article to evaporate the solvent in a timely manner. Lol.


So there you go. The three hoses are here
You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach

These are Delco branded hoses, and both fronts required a bit of massaging to get the area for the banjo bolt to sit in the proper aspect off the caliper to not run into suspension components. Not impossible, but ffs, why couldn't they get the bends right before hand. Lazy crap, but I made them work. Also, the passenger side fitting at the frame end was clocked wrong with the one way hole. Managed to change the control arm clamp positioning enough to make it work, but there's still a weird dip in how it is routed. Time will tell if the hose will accept the odd torsional, I don't like it.


In case you've never looked inside a front brake hose, here's a view of what you're missing. Easy to see how one can plug with little effort.
You must be registered for see images attach

It looks way smaller in real life. Never clamp a rubber line when removing a caliper, way too easy to crush the rubber and ruin it.
You know AC Delco now has three pricing and quality tiers now. 2 are just your standard parts store offshore garbage that everyone else sells. So they quit losing sales to the lowball chain stores.
 

xm20k

Runs on 93 octane, caffeine, and spite
Supporting Member
Joined
May 26, 2025
Posts
1,175
Reaction score
3,026
Location
Girard, Ohio
First Name
David
Truck Year
78
Truck Model
c10
Engine Size
388
A ha ha ha ha ha, not so fast self. They are not the same. Had a sunny 50° day today, so it was time to finish up the brake rubber program. Of course the painted master cylinder was bled and installed as well. Now since I am eternally curious, as part of the gravity bleed for the front half, I took note of which part went down and.... [drum roll please] the half closest to the booster lost level. I'm confused as to what I had originally said and without looking to see, I'm just going to amend any brain flatulence I may have broadcast.
You must be registered for see images attach

The paint still hasn't fully cured. Note to self, don't use engine paint in the PNW winter unless one is fully prepared to heat up the article to evaporate the solvent in a timely manner. Lol.


So there you go. The three hoses are here
You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach

These are Delco branded hoses, and both fronts required a bit of massaging to get the area for the banjo bolt to sit in the proper aspect off the caliper to not run into suspension components. Not impossible, but ffs, why couldn't they get the bends right before hand. Lazy crap, but I made them work. Also, the passenger side fitting at the frame end was clocked wrong with the one way hole. Managed to change the control arm clamp positioning enough to make it work, but there's still a weird dip in how it is routed. Time will tell if the hose will accept the odd torsional, I don't like it.


In case you've never looked inside a front brake hose, here's a view of what you're missing. Easy to see how one can plug with little effort.
You must be registered for see images attach

It looks way smaller in real life. Never clamp a rubber line when removing a caliper, way too easy to crush the rubber and ruin it.
Was swelling shut, should be bigger. What it should look like.
You must be registered for see images attach
 

Turbo4whl

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2019
Posts
4,085
Reaction score
10,388
Location
Downingtown, PA
First Name
Wayne
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
Jimmy
Engine Size
350
In case you've never looked inside a front brake hose, here's a view of what you're missing. Easy to see how one can plug with little effort.
You must be registered for see images attach


That hose is a good example of the bladder failing completely, and ready to become a check valve for holding pressure in the disc piston, or wheel cylinder.
 

Grit dog

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
9,507
Reaction score
17,443
Location
The Right side of Washington
First Name
Todd
Truck Year
1986, 1977
Truck Model
K20, C10
Engine Size
454, 350
Oh, so close.
Bigger reservoir = front Brakes. Bigger line on my square(cast iron square reservoirs as a whole ?) = rears.

:patriot:
Maybe I’m thinking typical disc disc setup? Idk. Fortunately both my squares came with new/great condition brake systems and I haven’t touched either, other than throwing new fluid at them occasionally.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
48,576
Posts
1,071,598
Members
43,128
Latest member
GBD4
Top