Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Gilderbeast

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Posts
113
Reaction score
77
Location
Fargo, ND
First Name
Brett
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K3500
Engine Size
496
Hello. I was hoping I could get an answer. Im trying to pick a hydraulic roller cam out for my 1980 Chevy K30 ,454, nv4500, and 4:10 gears. I plan on stroking the motor to 496, compression ratio around 9.8:1, and putting edelbrock pro flo 4 efi on it. It has longtube headers as well. I don't care about gas mileage. The truck will mainly be driven in late spring to early fall, probably averaging 30-40 miles a day. I want it to roast tires, haul ass, and be able to pull a 22ft SeaRay to the nearby lake and back. The lunati cams I am looking at are part numbers: 20110668, 20110120, 20110121. Would these be good cams? Thanks.
 

Preston

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Posts
787
Reaction score
354
Location
Mechanicsville VA
First Name
Preston
Truck Year
1983
Truck Model
k10
Engine Size
350
Welcome to GMSB from Virginia


Don’t know too much about the cam, but you will have an answer very soon, sure would like to see some pictures of your truck and the conversion to a tire burning monster.
 

Charlie

Mopar by Birth. Chevy by Choice.
Joined
Aug 2, 2017
Posts
1,837
Reaction score
909
Location
Euless, Texas
First Name
Don
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
Cheyenne 10 LWB
Engine Size
350/TH350/AC/4 BBL Quadrajet
:welcome:
 

shiftpro

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Posts
4,855
Reaction score
6,085
Location
BC Canada
First Name
shiftpro
Truck Year
73-87
Truck Model
1500, 2500, 3500
Engine Size
350, 383, 454, 496!
Hello. I was hoping I could get an answer. Im trying to pick a hydraulic roller cam out for my 1980 Chevy K30 ,454, nv4500, and 4:10 gears. I plan on stroking the motor to 496, compression ratio around 9.8:1, and putting edelbrock pro flo 4 efi on it. It has longtube headers as well. I don't care about gas mileage. The truck will mainly be driven in late spring to early fall, probably averaging 30-40 miles a day. I want it to roast tires, haul ass, and be able to pull a 22ft SeaRay to the nearby lake and back. The lunati cams I am looking at are part numbers: 20110668, 20110120, 20110121. Would these be good cams? Thanks.
Welcome to the site Brett.
You can run any of these cams. They might seem a little large for something that might get towing duty, but you can generally run a bigger cam with big cubes like a 496.
What heads will you be using? If cast iron you will need 781 or 049 heads and you should at least put a bigger exhaust valve in it and the bowls under the valve can be opened quite a bit.
I would wait until the engine is built before you order a cam, you just never know how things unfold.
And you should consider a late 80's block as they are already clearanced for a big cranks AND they are 4 bolt main.

One last thing, if you hope to get high miles out of this engine, like say 150K, I would go flat tappet. You're only gaining a slight edge with a retro roller
with the trade off of reduced long term reliability AND a whole bunch more $$.
 

Gilderbeast

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Posts
113
Reaction score
77
Location
Fargo, ND
First Name
Brett
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K3500
Engine Size
496
I am currently running 781 heads with stock valves. I have milled them .020. The block is a 79 two bolt main. It has been decked. I have main caps to get it splayed. I currently have edelbrocks performer cam in it. It is flat tappet with .500 lift and like 218 duration. Its a small cam for it. I think it could be way better. With the sequential port injection and efi I feel it would be able to handle those lunati cams. I also have hydroboost and no a/c so there would be no vacuum lines.
 

CoggedBelt75

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Posts
35,004
Reaction score
144,829
Location
Altus, Oklahoma
First Name
Joe
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
383
IMO, I would talk to the cam grinder. Who would know more about this than the ones who do this for a living with tons of feedback from their customers? They can give you a more accurate answer, as long as you give them exactly what you have and what you want it to do. Lots of variables to consider.
 

4WDKC

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Posts
2,366
Reaction score
1,090
Location
Southern Florida
First Name
Kacy
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
V10
Engine Size
350
One last thing, if you hope to get high miles out of this engine, like say 150K, I would go flat tappet. You're only gaining a slight edge with a retro roller
with the trade off of reduced long term reliability AND a whole bunch more $$.

Do you have sources of retro roller cams not being reliable for 150k miles ?

I am currently running 781 heads with stock valves. I have milled them .020. The block is a 79 two bolt main. It has been decked. I have main caps to get it splayed. I currently have edelbrocks performer cam in it. It is flat tappet with .500 lift and like 218 duration. Its a small cam for it. I think it could be way better. With the sequential port injection and efi I feel it would be able to handle those lunati cams. I also have hydroboost and no a/c so there would be no vacuum lines.

I didnt see a cam in there that I thought would make for low vacuum. I use this to help get an idea for cams, 230 degrees should come in under your stall and prevent lean bucking, but contacting a cam manufacturer will be the best option. They will want to know your compression,stall,gears tire size and weight of the vehicle so be prepared.. What efi are you going to be using?
You must be registered for see images attach
 

QBuff02

I like Big Blocks and I cannot lie
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2017
Posts
867
Reaction score
1,591
Location
Central IL
First Name
Quincy
Truck Year
1982
Truck Model
K30
Engine Size
454
I'll throw my hat in the ring here. Lots of variables go into play when picking the right cam. For your application with the increase in cubic inches, the lack of a torque converter due to the manual trans and no vacuum brakes would dictate that you could get away with a cam a couple sizes larger than what the "book" calls for. However, it sounds like you want to build a torque monster. But out of the cams you have listed above, I'd put my money on the 20110121 based off of your desire and the cubic inches you are building to. "Off the shelf" Camshafts are designed to fall within a certain cubic inch "range". That's why you always hear people say for example "I had great luck and made tons of power with this *** cam in my 355 so I reused it when I rebuilt and stroked the engine to a 383 and now the power just doesn't feel like it's there anymore". Because larger cubic inch engines require more demand from the increased displacement. Think of it like a giant air pump, which coincidentally is exactly what it is, if you increase the volume of the pump, you also increase the demand of the pump, so you need to feed it more for any marked improvement. So you need an Increase in lift and duration and you can play with lsa and centerlines and cam timing until you're blue in the face. so to fully benefit from it is a question truly left for the experts. That's why stroker applications can really get a little tricky with camshaft selection. Grinding a cam on a couple degree different lsa can make a ton of difference in the drivability and power down low. Just as much as degreeing a cam or altering the timing of it (timing of the cam, not the ignition) can make or lose 25+ hp in certain applications. And then, are you going to do anything crazy with the heads? Larger valves, opening up the throats, porting, port matching, unshrouding? What intake? are you going to run stock ratio or increased ratio rockers? etc etc? Some people don't realize it, but Velocity is key to making good power. And then you want to throw fuel injection on top of it, so that is going to have to be figured into the mix as well. So at the end of the day, if you really want to get the most bang for your buck, do as stated above and call Lunati and have every shred of information on your build and vehicle available that you can, and they'll get you a cam that falls right in your wheel house. You won't be disappointed.
 

shiftpro

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Posts
4,855
Reaction score
6,085
Location
BC Canada
First Name
shiftpro
Truck Year
73-87
Truck Model
1500, 2500, 3500
Engine Size
350, 383, 454, 496!
Do you have sources of retro roller cams not being reliable for 150k miles ?[/QUOTE

Cam tech from Lunati as matter of fact.
 

Gilderbeast

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Posts
113
Reaction score
77
Location
Fargo, ND
First Name
Brett
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K3500
Engine Size
496
So Im not running vacuum accessories. The edelbrock pro flo 4 efi. It only needs 7 inches of vacuum. I don't have an automatic so no stall/torque converter. Two of those lunati cams are listed under towing on summitracing. Ive called multiple companies and the cam companies. They always tell me different cams to run. Id rather contact a engine builder. Compression will be 9.8:1, 4:10 gears, 29" tires, and 5500 lbs truck.[/QUOTE]
 

Gilderbeast

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Posts
113
Reaction score
77
Location
Fargo, ND
First Name
Brett
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K3500
Engine Size
496
I'll throw my hat in the ring here. Lots of variables go into play when picking the right cam. For your application with the increase in cubic inches, the lack of a torque converter due to the manual trans and no vacuum brakes would dictate that you could get away with a cam a couple sizes larger than what the "book" calls for. However, it sounds like you want to build a torque monster. But out of the cams you have listed above, I'd put my money on the 20110121 based off of your desire and the cubic inches you are building to. "Off the shelf" Camshafts are designed to fall within a certain cubic inch "range". That's why you always hear people say for example "I had great luck and made tons of power with this *** cam in my 355 so I reused it when I rebuilt and stroked the engine to a 383 and now the power just doesn't feel like it's there anymore". Because larger cubic inch engines require more demand from the increased displacement. Think of it like a giant air pump, which coincidentally is exactly what it is, if you increase the volume of the pump, you also increase the demand of the pump, so you need to feed it more for any marked improvement. So you need an Increase in lift and duration and you can play with lsa and centerlines and cam timing until you're blue in the face. so to fully benefit from it is a question truly left for the experts. That's why stroker applications can really get a little tricky with camshaft selection. Grinding a cam on a couple degree different lsa can make a ton of difference in the drivability and power down low. Just as much as degreeing a cam or altering the timing of it (timing of the cam, not the ignition) can make or lose 25+ hp in certain applications. And then, are you going to do anything crazy with the heads? Larger valves, opening up the throats, porting, port matching, unshrouding? What intake? are you going to run stock ratio or increased ratio rockers? etc etc? Some people don't realize it, but Velocity is key to making good power. And then you want to throw fuel injection on top of it, so that is going to have to be figured into the mix as well. So at the end of the day, if you really want to get the most bang for your buck, do as stated above and call Lunati and have every shred of information on your build and vehicle available that you can, and they'll get you a cam that falls right in your wheel house. You won't be disappointed.
So I plan on upgrading the 781 heads with bigger valves, most likely attempt to port them myself. If I ruin them then I'll get some AFR aluminum heads. The intake goes with the efi. Its not throttle body its sequential port injection. Stock ratio 1.7 rocker arms. Don't want to mess up the geometry. The 20110121 is listed under towing on summit.
 

Gilderbeast

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Posts
113
Reaction score
77
Location
Fargo, ND
First Name
Brett
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K3500
Engine Size
496
I lied. This is the cam listed under towing for 454 on summit.
20110711

You must be registered for see images attach
 

CoggedBelt75

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Posts
35,004
Reaction score
144,829
Location
Altus, Oklahoma
First Name
Joe
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
383
Ive called multiple companies and the cam companies. They always tell me different cams to run. Id rather contact a engine builder. Compression will be 9.8:1, 4:10 gears, 29" tires, and 5500 lbs truck.
[/QUOTE]
You will get many different responses from them. Unless you are trying to wring every ounce of horsepower out of it, whatever they may tell you will be within reason. Even if you were to ask 10 different builders, you would probably get about 10 different answers. On that note....there is a place called KPE Racing on Huff Rd in the Falls, (940) 696-3278. They do a lot of the drag racers stuff in the area. Or just go to the local track in Iowa Park, 16 minutes from the Falls, on weekends and talk with the guys there. Lots of tested knowledge floating around in the pits.
If you do decide to go to the track, holler & we can meet up as my son & I go there quite a bit before my job kicks in July.
 

Gilderbeast

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Posts
113
Reaction score
77
Location
Fargo, ND
First Name
Brett
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K3500
Engine Size
496
You will get many different responses from them. Unless you are trying to wring every ounce of horsepower out of it, whatever they may tell you will be within reason. Even if you were to ask 10 different builders, you would probably get about 10 different answers. On that note....there is a place called KPE Racing on Huff Rd in the Falls, (940) 696-3278. They do a lot of the drag racers stuff in the area. Or just go to the local track in Iowa Park, 16 minutes from the Falls, on weekends and talk with the guys there. Lots of tested knowledge floating around in the pits.
If you do decide to go to the track, holler & we can meet up as my son & I go there quite a bit before my job kicks in July.[/QUOTE]
Definitely will do! Thanks for the help. Id loved to come hang out. Theres nothing for me to so on the weekends on base and I have nothing to wrench on. I have my 97 K1500 with me down here though. Might trade it for a k5 if I can find a nice one.
 

shiftpro

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2012
Posts
4,855
Reaction score
6,085
Location
BC Canada
First Name
shiftpro
Truck Year
73-87
Truck Model
1500, 2500, 3500
Engine Size
350, 383, 454, 496!
So I plan on upgrading the 781 heads with bigger valves, most likely attempt to port them myself. If I ruin them then I'll get some AFR aluminum heads. The intake goes with the efi. Its not throttle body its sequential port injection. Stock ratio 1.7 rocker arms. Don't want to mess up the geometry. The 20110121 is listed under towing on summit.
Porting is hard work but again, it's also easy. The worst part is the mess. Stick the shop vac hose in the opposite end of the port you're working on.
Where these heads really benefit is opening the bowls and thinning and lowering the valve guide bosses. They are huge in the exhaust track.
These heads can support nearly 700 hp even with the stock sized intake valve. Exhaust valve at the least should be larger. THEN you can run a single pattern cam. Lots of controversy here... The larger/longer exhaust duration we see on cams is to make up for the small and restricted exhaust, so with large valves and the bowl open the dual pattern is not helpful anymore.

Another tip on your 781 heads... when replacing the valve guides, use the solid bronze bushings. Don't use the cast with bronze insert, they are inferior to solid brass. Also, solid brass conducts heat better. It's a propane MUST HAVE but there is no reason to not use them all around. They also seem to stay in place better than cast. The cast guides on the exhaust side can tend to move. When I was rebuilding engines at Aklands in the late 70's we knurled the cast guides and pressed them in with lots of green locktite.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
41,847
Posts
903,379
Members
33,361
Latest member
iiixtremeiii
Top