- Joined
- Aug 3, 2010
- Posts
- 35,425
- Reaction score
- 44,729
- Location
- Usually not in Ohio
- First Name
- Andy
- Truck Year
- '77, '78, '79, '84, '88
- Truck Model
- K5 thru K30
- Engine Size
- 350-454
^This.
And I noticed that about the AT3KO’s. I have yet to have opportunity to run a set of them. I always liked the previous versions for snow traction and longevity. My guess is a shift not unlike other mfgs to aggressive looking tires that have great road manners for the zillions of tough looking pavement pounders running around (myself included).
Bottom line is most all tires perform at least relatively well for their intended use when the tread depth is >50% and traction is almost as much a factor of tire pressure and newer more pliable rubber as it is specific tread design. (R/T tread designs being a decided exception when it comes to snow. I don’t like that design)
And back to the OPs original question. Pick a tire that looks good in his budget and it’ll be fine for his stated use.
Interesting! I've never run any type of "R/T" tire, until I got a set on the work truck this last fall. Honestly, this set I got kicks a$$ in the snow. I wasn't aware that "R/T" was a thing, other than how Falken branded this specific model.
You must be registered for see images attach
Well, I guess I've had other RT tires... but they were the old bias ply Goodyear Wranger RT II's of the early 80's. Completely different animal.