305 SBC vs 6.2 Detroit: Which would you rather?

Which Engine?

  • 305 SBC

    Votes: 14 38.9%

  • 6.2 Detroit

    Votes: 22 61.1%
  • Total voters
    36

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Turbo4whl

Turbo4whl

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2019
Posts
2,884
Reaction score
6,485
Location
Downingtown, PA
First Name
Wayne
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
Jimmy
Engine Size
350
Rickf said:
Real trucks don't have spark plugs. :cheers:
Click to expand...

Real trucks have 6 in a row, so they will go.

Strick said:
Give me the Detroit with an SM465 all day long! Real trucks have a clutch pedal and no spark plugs… (here comes the hate messages)!

Strickland
Click to expand...
If the Detroit you speak of is a 2 stroke, I'm with you. We had 6.2's in the fleet back in the day. They clocked a lot more shop time, I'll repeat, a lot more shop time than the trucks with spark plugs.
 
1

1x1_Speed_Craig

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2023
Posts
80
Reaction score
169
Location
Greeneville, TN
First Name
Craig
Truck Year
1986/1985
Truck Model
1986 M1008, 1985 M1028
Engine Size
6.2L diesel
Hunter79764 said:
In a drag race, I'm not sure either would win, but I think I'd rather have some extra torque down low and the idea that I could run biodiesel etc. in case of emergency, so I vote 6.2. But, I've never owned either and never had a diesel, so it's purely an opinion based on stuffs I've heard in the internet, and we all know how reliable that is.
Click to expand...

Unless you're making your own biodiesel fuel, which is a fairly involved process and requires a lot of up-front $$$ for equipment, it really isn't a notable reason to consider the 6.2L. I get that it sounds good "on paper", though. I used to make my own bio, so I have hands-on experience with the process and equipment. WVO *could* be an option, but it can also cause a lot of mechanical issues over time, and also requires some spendy up-front infrastructure to use in a vehicle.

Semi-related...can't tell you the last time I saw biodiesel commercially available at the pump.

Craig
 
squaredeal91

squaredeal91

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2023
Posts
1,804
Reaction score
3,166
Location
Cave junction Oregon
First Name
Greg bush
Truck Year
1991 SB
Truck Model
K30
Engine Size
5.9 Cummins 12 valve
1x1_Speed_Craig said:
Unless you're making your own biodiesel fuel, which is a fairly involved process and requires a lot of up-front $$$ for equipment, it really isn't a notable reason to consider the 6.2L. I get that it sounds good "on paper", though. I used to make my own bio, so I have hands-on experience with the process and equipment. WVO *could* be an option, but it can also cause a lot of mechanical issues over time, and also requires some spendy up-front infrastructure to use in a vehicle.

Semi-related...can't tell you the last time I saw biodiesel commercially available at the pump.

Craig

Ive Seen that with heavy equipment failures and that's with newer seals and gaskets.
Click to expand...
 
bucket

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
29,114
Reaction score
23,984
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
Hunter79764 said:
In a drag race, I'm not sure either would win, but I think I'd rather have some extra torque down low and the idea that I could run biodiesel etc. in case of emergency, so I vote 6.2. But, I've never owned either and never had a diesel, so it's purely an opinion based on stuffs I've heard in the internet, and we all know how reliable that is.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that if they were to race each other, with no other challengers, they both would lose? If so, I agree lol.
 
Blue Ox

Blue Ox

Turning Diesel Fuel Into Fun
Joined
Mar 27, 2018
Posts
4,892
Reaction score
10,838
Location
LI-NY
First Name
Derek
Truck Year
MCMLXXXV
Truck Model
K20HD
Engine Size
6.2L
1x1_Speed_Craig said:
Unless you're making your own biodiesel fuel, which is a fairly involved process and requires a lot of up-front $$$ for equipment, it really isn't a notable reason to consider the 6.2L. I get that it sounds good "on paper", though. I used to make my own bio, so I have hands-on experience with the process and equipment. WVO *could* be an option, but it can also cause a lot of mechanical issues over time, and also requires some spendy up-front infrastructure to use in a vehicle.

Semi-related...can't tell you the last time I saw biodiesel commercially available at the pump.

Craig
Click to expand...

I think the perspective on alternative fuels should also take disaster scenarios into account. In the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy we were without electric for a week and gas was hard to come by for longer than that. After the gasoline supply crashed Diesel was still relatively easy to find. After that I had the option to burn heating oil. Another couple of days and it would have come to that. For the gas engine crowd the only alternative was deathanol 85 and that wasn't all that common to start with so it only extended the supply for a couple of days at best.

Needless to say that's not the big decision maker for what you want to live with, but it sure was nice to be able to stay mobile while everyone else was standing in line like it was 1973.
 
1

1x1_Speed_Craig

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2023
Posts
80
Reaction score
169
Location
Greeneville, TN
First Name
Craig
Truck Year
1986/1985
Truck Model
1986 M1008, 1985 M1028
Engine Size
6.2L diesel
Blue Ox said:
I think the perspective on alternative fuels should also take disaster scenarios into account. In the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy we were without electric for a week and gas was hard to come by for longer than that. After the gasoline supply crashed Diesel was still relatively easy to find. After that I had the option to burn heating oil. Another couple of days and it would have come to that. For the gas engine crowd the only alternative was deathanol 85 and that wasn't all that common to start with so it only extended the supply for a couple of days at best.

Needless to say that's not the big decision maker for what you want to live with, but it sure was nice to be able to stay mobile while everyone else was standing in line like it was 1973.
Click to expand...

I agree 100%, and am definitely of the same "preparedness mindset". My intended point was that you don't just "whip up biodiesel" in a pinch. Any multi-fuel-capable engine is a great thing, though.

Side note: My CUCV is also fairly EMP-resilient, and we have EMP protection on my wife's late-model car, too. We want to cover ourselves for a variety of potential SHTF scenarios.


*****


@squaredeal91 - Regarding your comment "Ive Seen that with heavy equipment failures and that's with newer seals and gaskets."...

I don't know the specifics of the equipment you mentioned, but it'll depend on whether those "newer seals and gaskets" were made of Viton or not. Viton resists degradation from biodiesel. It could also potentially depend on the engine design, bio quality, and percentage of bio mix. Older mechanically-injected diesels are very tolerant of bio use. I ran it in an '80 Mercedes 5-cylinder, and upgraded my fuel lines with Viton lines before doing so. I ran 100% bio in the summer, and 50% bio through the Michigan winter (but my fuel was ASTM-grade made with good-quality oil that didn't coagulate in the cold).
 
P

peats

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Posts
290
Reaction score
238
Location
Pennsylvania
First Name
john
Truck Year
72k5, 81c10 short step, 83k10 short fleet, 03 SSR. 25 chevy doodlebug
Truck Model
k5 c10 k10 SSR doodlebug
Engine Size
406 360 6.2 5.3 171
I prefer the 6.2 and it has turned into my daily driver over the '81 sbc. Even though my garage doesn't go below 40deg.F the 6.2 really likes the block heater. I don't mind that it's slow, I'm retired.
 
V

vr1967

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2023
Posts
174
Reaction score
649
Location
Mississippi
First Name
Virgil
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
k1500
Engine Size
6.2L turbo
Whatever is in the best condition, the nicest truck, for the best deal that you can get is what I say the winner is.

I have an 84 K1500 swb with a 6.2, with a Banks turbo, 3.42s and 33s, currently with an SM465 4sp, so no OD, and get 22-24mpg if I keep my foot out of it. Plan to do a 4L80 swap soon, so hopefully mileage will stay the same.
9lb of boost with the Banks has surprised it’s fair share of gas burners at the lights. While it makes it no hot rod (thats what the bbc 67 Camaro I have is for) it really wakes the engine up performance wise.
 
Finkaire

Finkaire

Finkaire
Joined
Dec 28, 2021
Posts
446
Reaction score
727
Location
California
First Name
Loren
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
Silverado c10
Engine Size
305
Personally i would like the VIN plate on a 6.2 to attach to my 305 to avoid California smog
 
Blue Ox

Blue Ox

Turning Diesel Fuel Into Fun
Joined
Mar 27, 2018
Posts
4,892
Reaction score
10,838
Location
LI-NY
First Name
Derek
Truck Year
MCMLXXXV
Truck Model
K20HD
Engine Size
6.2L
1x1_Speed_Craig said:
I agree 100%, and am definitely of the same "preparedness mindset". My intended point was that you don't just "whip up biodiesel" in a pinch. Any multi-fuel-capable engine is a great thing, though.

Side note: My CUCV is also fairly EMP-resilient, and we have EMP protection on my wife's late-model car, too. We want to cover ourselves for a variety of potential SHTF scenarios.


*****


@squaredeal91 - Regarding your comment "Ive Seen that with heavy equipment failures and that's with newer seals and gaskets."...

I don't know the specifics of the equipment you mentioned, but it'll depend on whether those "newer seals and gaskets" were made of Viton or not. Viton resists degradation from biodiesel. It could also potentially depend on the engine design, bio quality, and percentage of bio mix. Older mechanically-injected diesels are very tolerant of bio use. I ran it in an '80 Mercedes 5-cylinder, and upgraded my fuel lines with Viton lines before doing so. I ran 100% bio in the summer, and 50% bio through the Michigan winter (but my fuel was ASTM-grade made with good-quality oil that didn't coagulate in the cold).
Click to expand...

I wasn't critiquing your experience with bio. I have plenty of it myself, and while I'm an advocate of it, I recognize it's limitations. During the price spike back in ought-eight we had a lot of customers fiddling with it. One of the most prolific was a fish market that was getting used fryer oil from the restaurants they supplied and converting it to some bio and mostly straight use. That ran a generator that powered their refrigeration. It was a significant process just to clean the waste oil, but they were reasonably successful with it. Unfortunately, when they weren't they would also seize an injection pump on a near annual basis.
 
1

1x1_Speed_Craig

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2023
Posts
80
Reaction score
169
Location
Greeneville, TN
First Name
Craig
Truck Year
1986/1985
Truck Model
1986 M1008, 1985 M1028
Engine Size
6.2L diesel
Blue Ox said:
I wasn't critiquing your experience with bio. I have plenty of it myself, and while I'm an advocate of it, I recognize it's limitations. During the price spike back in ought-eight we had a lot of customers fiddling with it. One of the most prolific was a fish market that was getting used fryer oil from the restaurants they supplied and converting it to some bio and mostly straight use. That ran a generator that powered their refrigeration. It was a significant process just to clean the waste oil, but they were reasonably successful with it. Unfortunately, when they weren't they would also seize an injection pump on a near annual basis.
Click to expand...

Very cool. I love creative fuel source ideas. When I was still doing it, people were looking into algae, used coffee grounds, etc. as sources for oil. It was possible, but the yield was so low that it wasn't practical.

BTW, I didn't necessarily think you were critiquing my experience; I just didn't know if I conveyed my intended point well enough. Sometimes my brain moves faster than my fingers or mouth. :)
 
J

Junior 01

Junior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Posts
4
Reaction score
8
Location
MO
First Name
Craig
Truck Year
1982
Truck Model
C30
Engine Size
454
I've had 2 trucks with the 305 but no experience with the 6.2. I know the 305 can be mostly adequate if the cam, intake, and carb are swapped, so I'd go that way again and definitely use ceramic headers and duel exhaust.
 
C

cadyED

Junior Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2023
Posts
2
Reaction score
1
Location
Az
First Name
Ed
Truck Year
1986
Truck Model
K5
Engine Size
Lq9
6.2 all day especially m1008 with its extra power and sweet military options it won't get u there fast. as long as it has oil it'll keep rattling. The 6.5 better option but not comparable to diesels these days
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
42,136
Posts
909,932
Members
33,636
Latest member
ehef
Top