10 Bolt Tie Rod question

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

SubDominant

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2020
Posts
117
Reaction score
101
Location
California
First Name
Keith
Truck Year
1989
Truck Model
V1500
Engine Size
5.7L
Hello guys! I have a question about my 1989 v1500 Suburban. Whoever owned it before me went romping on some rocks and bent the tie rod. It still steered but I saw a noticeable bend in it. I bought what I was told is a square body Tie rod. Only thing is it seems to be a little bit shorter than my original. I installed it anyways and in order to adjust my toe, I noticed that there are no threads showing in the slot of the adjuster. I tightened it up and took it for a short drive and it seems fine, but I am worried that I do not have enough threads in the adjuster.

I plan to take pictures when I have daylight. Any suggestions on if it is ok the way it is? Has anyone done something similar? What were the results? I want to live!!
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,209
Reaction score
6,193
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
by shorter do you mean the amount of threads? as long as its got 2+ inches of threads i dont see an issue for using it
 

1979k10

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2019
Posts
55
Reaction score
140
Location
Nevada
First Name
Dave
Truck Year
1979
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
52 1/4 inches is what the moog part #ds893 measures.
Used it on my 1989 v1500 Blazer without any issues.
 

SubDominant

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2020
Posts
117
Reaction score
101
Location
California
First Name
Keith
Truck Year
1989
Truck Model
V1500
Engine Size
5.7L
52 1/4 inches is what the moog part #ds893 measures.
Used it on my 1989 v1500 Blazer without any issues.

Mine seems to measure about an inch shorter than what you mention.
 

SubDominant

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2020
Posts
117
Reaction score
101
Location
California
First Name
Keith
Truck Year
1989
Truck Model
V1500
Engine Size
5.7L
by shorter do you mean the amount of threads? as long as its got 2+ inches of threads i dont see an issue for using it

Plenty of threads on the rod. Not so much threaded into the sleeve. That is where my concern is. Now everything bolted up just fine, just shorter than the one that was in there by about an inch.
 

1979k10

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2019
Posts
55
Reaction score
140
Location
Nevada
First Name
Dave
Truck Year
1979
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
Sounds like you maybe have different manufacturer parts mixed up on the front end?
You should have some visible threads in the slot that would allow for any adjustments.
Without changing the tie rod, you could try to find a longer adjusting sleeve.
 

SubDominant

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2020
Posts
117
Reaction score
101
Location
California
First Name
Keith
Truck Year
1989
Truck Model
V1500
Engine Size
5.7L
Pics:

Original on left (longer) . replacement on right (shorter)
You must be registered for see images attach


Installed sleeve view: (you can see how much I had to extend it to fit)

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Blue Ox

Turning Diesel Fuel Into Fun
Joined
Mar 27, 2018
Posts
4,885
Reaction score
10,819
Location
LI-NY
First Name
Derek
Truck Year
MCMLXXXV
Truck Model
K20HD
Engine Size
6.2L
Do you own a ruler?

It doesn't look like your final install is a problem, but why don't you measure the individual components and compare them to each other? Maybe you can find the discrepancy there. Also, it's hard to tell from the pictures, but it looks like there's some unequal thread engagement on the left one.

As long as you have an inch of thread engagement on each side of your final install it should be fine.
 

idahovette

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2016
Posts
6,556
Reaction score
14,078
Location
Weiser Idaho
First Name
Perry
Truck Year
1975-1979
Truck Model
K20-K10
Engine Size
350
I don't like the looks of it. If you run it like this I would loosen the clamps and slide both out toward the ends a ways and then retighten just to get more coverage over the solid part of the tie rod.
 

Blue Ox

Turning Diesel Fuel Into Fun
Joined
Mar 27, 2018
Posts
4,885
Reaction score
10,819
Location
LI-NY
First Name
Derek
Truck Year
MCMLXXXV
Truck Model
K20HD
Engine Size
6.2L
I don't like the looks of it. If you run it like this I would loosen the clamps and slide both out toward the ends a ways and then retighten just to get more coverage over the solid part of the tie rod.

Good point. One of the problems with the info we have and the photos is we can't see the threads in the sleeve.
 

idahovette

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2016
Posts
6,556
Reaction score
14,078
Location
Weiser Idaho
First Name
Perry
Truck Year
1975-1979
Truck Model
K20-K10
Engine Size
350
Agreed. If the threads are in far enough to be covered by the clamp, it will probably be ok. There is still something wacky about that long end being shorter. I'll try to remember to check my MOOG book to see if there are measurements on different lengths. Might get this done, might not.......old AND forgetful
 

Blue Ox

Turning Diesel Fuel Into Fun
Joined
Mar 27, 2018
Posts
4,885
Reaction score
10,819
Location
LI-NY
First Name
Derek
Truck Year
MCMLXXXV
Truck Model
K20HD
Engine Size
6.2L
Agreed. If the threads are in far enough to be covered by the clamp, it will probably be ok. There is still something wacky about that long end being shorter. I'll try to remember to check my MOOG book to see if there are measurements on different lengths. Might get this done, might not.......old AND forgetful

The OP can do a little homework too. It would help all of us.
 

SubDominant

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2020
Posts
117
Reaction score
101
Location
California
First Name
Keith
Truck Year
1989
Truck Model
V1500
Engine Size
5.7L
The OP can do a little homework too. It would help all of us.

I did measure it. I said in a previous post that it measured about an inch shorter than my original. My problem is that I am in unfamiliar territory. I was hoping someone ran across the same scenario and could advise.

All of the research I did came up with 52.25" on the long end for early eighties to late eighties squares. So I am confused why I have one that measures 51.25". I got it from a guy who parts out squares. Could be someone rigged this up to get by before getting rid of their truck. He probably just pulled it off and sold it as is not knowing.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
42,116
Posts
909,516
Members
33,611
Latest member
RNFL
Top