Question on the Comparison of a New, Quality Rag Joint to U-joint Coupler

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Dejure

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2025
Posts
477
Reaction score
924
Location
Eastern Washington
First Name
Kelly
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
C15
Engine Size
350
A new question I haven't found a clear answer to, after reading a lot of posts across several sites:

Would I see significant gain by going with a u-joint coupler instead of a good quality rag joint.

Every post I read talks about a huge improvement after a coupler was replaced, BUT, except where there are angle issues, the posts state there was a huge improvement indicated to be because the replaced coupler was failing. Accordingly, even a new, cheap rag joint would result in improvement.

Thus my question. And I am even more interested in knowing how much of an improvement I'd see using a double U-joint coupler over a rag joint because I am going to be going over the entire front end (shocks, ball joints, idler. pitman, tie rod ends, all bushing, and a new Redhed gearbox) and want my truck to handle as tightly as my old 69 did decades ago (it was great after the changes noted).
 

Ricko1966

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2017
Posts
9,940
Reaction score
19,069
Location
kansas
First Name
Rick
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
c20
Engine Size
350
A third thing to throw into the equation. GM made different steering couplers besides different sizes and diameters. The made 4 ply and 7 ply. 7 ply was tougher and more rigid,manual steering got 7 ply,Corvettes got 7 ply and close ratio boxes got 7 ply. Personally I'd put on a 7 ply and call it a day. The reason for the rubber rag joint is to isolate sound and vibration from traveling up the steering shaft.
 
Last edited:

SquareRoot

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Posts
4,501
Reaction score
8,902
Location
Arizona
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
85
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
I noticed a difference when I did the Jeep Shaft Mod. Kind of like the difference of an auto trans and a manual trans. It "feels" more responsive.
 

dd1990

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Posts
83
Reaction score
128
Location
Oxnard, CA
First Name
David
Truck Year
1990
Truck Model
Suburban 1500
Engine Size
350
Why did GM get rid of rag joint and use a U-joint on the c3500 steering shaft? IDK, but what I do know is the u-joint offers better feel of the road, a bit more road vibration yes, but the slop is minimized.
 

edgephoto

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2023
Posts
480
Reaction score
763
Location
Stafford, CT
First Name
Greg
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
GMC V3500
Engine Size
7.4L
I decided to stick with my rag joint. The resto shop owner where my truck is now put one in his Ford pickup he restored. He said he hated the vibration he felt and he went back to a rag joint.
 

Dejure

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2025
Posts
477
Reaction score
924
Location
Eastern Washington
First Name
Kelly
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
C15
Engine Size
350
AND, there is indication U-Joints are an All-Or-Nothing thing. That is, when they go, steering is gone. Rag joints just get sloppier and sloppier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WFO

Dejure

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2025
Posts
477
Reaction score
924
Location
Eastern Washington
First Name
Kelly
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
C15
Engine Size
350
Now comes the question, what's a favored brand of rag joint?

A fellow at Redhead Steering Gears said just don't go cheap. Nothing below the $50.00 dollar mark. I have no problem biting the bullet and going with even a $100.00 unit, in light of that it'll last another 40 years (longer than my 74 year old but will last).
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2021
Posts
925
Reaction score
3,372
Location
Tennessee
First Name
Matt
Truck Year
1979
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
6.17775926 liters, 3L80, 228.6mm axle
Why did GM get rid of rag joint and use a U-joint on the c3500 steering shaft? IDK, but what I do know is the u-joint offers better feel of the road, a bit more road vibration yes, but the slop is minimized.
Because the average C3500 driver isn't gonna have soft hands and drinking Starbucks with his pinky out lol
 

Ricko1966

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2017
Posts
9,940
Reaction score
19,069
Location
kansas
First Name
Rick
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
c20
Engine Size
350
Why did GM get rid of rag joint and use a U-joint on the c3500 steering shaft? IDK, but what I do know is the u-joint offers better feel of the road, a bit more road vibration yes, but the slop is minimized.
The slop is minimized when new. A new 7 layer ragjoint doesn't feel sloppy compared to a worn out 5 layer rag joint either. I've changed plenty of worn out ujoint steering shafts in the past. Even used 2 to make one good one before when I had 2 that both had 1 sloppy joint. I'm not saying universal shafts are bad,I'm just saying the aren't magic. They won't make you more popular or better looking.
 
Last edited:

idahovette

Full Access Member
Firefighter
Joined
Aug 7, 2016
Posts
9,541
Reaction score
22,418
Location
Weiser Idaho
First Name
Perry
Truck Year
1975-1979
Truck Model
K20-K10
Engine Size
350
^^^^DAMN^^^^^
 

1lejohn

Full Access Member
Joined
May 14, 2012
Posts
574
Reaction score
1,741
Location
texas
First Name
john
Truck Year
1985 , 2004
Truck Model
k-1500, 2500 HD
Engine Size
350, 6.7
The slop is minimized when new. A new 7 layer ragjoint doesn't feel sloppy compared to a worn out 5 layer rag joint either. I've changed plenty of worn out ujoint steering shafts in the past. Even used 2 to make one good one before when I had 2 that both had 1 sloppy joint. I'm not saying universal shafts are bad,I'm just saying the aren't magic. They won't make you more popular or better looking.
They do magically add 20 horsepower.:D
 

Grit dog

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
9,429
Reaction score
17,285
Location
The Right side of Washington
First Name
Todd
Truck Year
1986, 1977
Truck Model
K20, C10
Engine Size
454, 350
The slop is minimized when new. A new 7 layer ragjoint doesn't feel sloppy compared to a worn out 5 layer rag joint either. I've changed plenty of worn out ujoint steering shafts in the past. Even used 2 to make one good one before when I had 2 that both had 1 sloppy joint. I'm not saying universal shafts are bad,I'm just saying the aren't magic. They won't make you more popular or better looking.
What he said.
The Jeep steering shaft mod is good but remember that these things drove well with rag joints before they got old and wore out.
Plus you have a 2wd on little tires, pavement pounder. Your steering system isn’t getting worked very hard or abused presumably.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
48,401
Posts
1,066,562
Members
42,779
Latest member
blue10
Top