Brake parts questions on a 79 sierra.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Retoxtony

Member
Joined
May 21, 2021
Posts
45
Reaction score
53
Location
SK, Canada
First Name
Tony
Truck Year
1979, 1982
Truck Model
C15
Engine Size
5.7
Hopefully a easy question for someone here. Are brake parts like calipers and pads the same for trucks with the HD (1.25) rotors vs the smaller ones? I was ordering some parts this morning and both at Napa and then on Rock Auto they dont differentiate between them. Unless I’m missing something obvious here? Or do all trucks of some years have the fatter rotors?

I am in the process of lowering this truck and it’s turned into a full rebuild of the front end. I figured while I have everything apart I might as well do the brakes as well.
 

Bextreme04

Full Access Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Posts
4,135
Reaction score
4,984
Location
Oregon
First Name
Eric
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K25
Engine Size
350-4bbl
There is difference in pads between JB5, JB6, and JB7 brakes. It is not expressly related to rotor thickness. What RPO brakes do you have?
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,121
Reaction score
6,038
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
I could be wrong with this but 1979 i BELIEVE is the first year for metric GM brakes which maybe it was 81 Im not so certain, but i believe rotor differences could be for a larger rotor, thickness wise, but not radially, had a dual piston or perhaps still 1 piston caliper but with more surface area of pad. Alternatively, the weigjht range of the truck or some option may have designated larger cooling vane size and thats why. I read way too much abotu the subject for my car and forgot the truck specifics.
edit: that reminds me, the front brakes im pretty sure are important to make sure it stays right because half ton truck is gonna be semi floating front while full floating for a 3/4 ton, which is one thing that would be a jump in rotor diameter. im assumign you are only talking about offerings for 3/4 ton but thought to mention it
 
Last edited:

Retoxtony

Member
Joined
May 21, 2021
Posts
45
Reaction score
53
Location
SK, Canada
First Name
Tony
Truck Year
1979, 1982
Truck Model
C15
Engine Size
5.7
There is difference in pads between JB5, JB6, and JB7 brakes. It is not expressly related to rotor thickness. What RPO brakes do you have?
RPO codes are JB5 and J55. So it’s the 1.25” HD brakes.

The issue I’m having is when I call for brake parts for a 79 GMC they tell me they don’t list different pads, calipers, etc for different RPO codes or 1.25” rotors vs 1”. The parts guy at NAPA flat out told me that 79 GMC trucks only have one size set of brakes. I told him I’m pretty sure he’s wrong, but that’s why I’m here asking. I just really hate ordering the wrong parts.
 

Bextreme04

Full Access Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Posts
4,135
Reaction score
4,984
Location
Oregon
First Name
Eric
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K25
Engine Size
350-4bbl
RPO codes are JB5 and J55. So it’s the 1.25” HD brakes.

The issue I’m having is when I call for brake parts for a 79 GMC they tell me they don’t list different pads, calipers, etc for different RPO codes or 1.25” rotors vs 1”. The parts guy at NAPA flat out told me that 79 GMC trucks only have one size set of brakes. I told him I’m pretty sure he’s wrong, but that’s why I’m here asking. I just really hate ordering the wrong parts.
1.25" brakes means nothing... all pre-80's C10's had 1.25" rotors. In fact... all C10's before the 80's had the same front rotor size. The J55 option just means you have power brakes, since the standard was manual brakes with no booster. Having the higher gross weight meant you got those RPO codes standard.

Here's a thread from a few years ago talking about this specifically. I would scroll all the way to the end, the front has a lot of conjecture and wrongful speculation. Keith comes in at the end with the real info(he worked in the truck assembly line back in the day).
https://www.gmsquarebody.com/threads/rpo-j55.21924/page-2
 

Retoxtony

Member
Joined
May 21, 2021
Posts
45
Reaction score
53
Location
SK, Canada
First Name
Tony
Truck Year
1979, 1982
Truck Model
C15
Engine Size
5.7
1.25" brakes means nothing... all pre-80's C10's had 1.25" rotors. In fact... all C10's before the 80's had the same front rotor size. The J55 option just means you have power brakes, since the standard was manual brakes with no booster. Having the higher gross weight meant you got those RPO codes standard.

Here's a thread from a few years ago talking about this specifically. I would scroll all the way to the end, the front has a lot of conjecture and wrongful speculation. Keith comes in at the end with the real info(he worked in the truck assembly line back in the day).
https://www.gmsquarebody.com/threads/rpo-j55.21924/page-2
Thanks, that’s pretty helpful. I had no idea all pre-80s had the thicker rotors but that alone answers a few questions I had in my head. I’d assume all calipers from those trucks should be the same then as well? If that’s the case I’ll just order some from Rock Auto.
 

AuroraGirl

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
9,121
Reaction score
6,038
Location
Northern Wisconsin
First Name
Taylor
Truck Year
1978, 1980
Truck Model
K10, K25
Engine Size
400(?), 350
Thanks, that’s pretty helpful. I had no idea all pre-80s had the thicker rotors but that alone answers a few questions I had in my head. I’d assume all calipers from those trucks should be the same then as well? If that’s the case I’ll just order some from Rock Auto.
Does that apply to K10 too? Just wondering

Also sorry OP just occured to me youre talking 2wd fronts RIP
 

Grit dog

Full Access Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
5,882
Reaction score
9,622
Location
Washington
First Name
Todd
Truck Year
1986
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
454
I could be wrong with this but 1979 i BELIEVE is the first year for metric GM brakes which maybe it was 81 Im not so certain, but i believe rotor differences could be for a larger rotor, thickness wise, but not radially, had a dual piston or perhaps still 1 piston caliper but with more surface area of pad. Alternatively, the weigjht range of the truck or some option may have designated larger cooling vane size and thats why. I read way too much abotu the subject for my car and forgot the truck specifics.
edit: that reminds me, the front brakes im pretty sure are important to make sure it stays right because half ton truck is gonna be semi floating front while full floating for a 3/4 ton, which is one thing that would be a jump in rotor diameter. im assumign you are only talking about offerings for 3/4 ton but thought to mention it
???
 

Turbo4whl

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2019
Posts
2,837
Reaction score
6,356
Location
Downingtown, PA
First Name
Wayne
Truck Year
1974
Truck Model
Jimmy
Engine Size
350
Okay, my '82 came with semi-metallic front brake pads. Since I play hard, I warped the front rotors before I wore out the pads. Cut and trued the original rotors and bought the soft pads (organic). I put 200,000 miles on those same rotors. Yes, had to change the pads sooner but didn't warp the rotors again.

Your truck takes D-52 pads. Friction material, your choice. Parts people only know what is in their list.
 

MikeB

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Posts
1,745
Reaction score
935
Location
Justin, TX
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1969
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
355
My 82 C10 had 1" thick rotors, which also means different caliper, spindle, and inner wheel bearing. Pads are the same as 1.25" brakes.

My 69 C10 has 1" brakes & spindles from an 85 C10, but they work great. Only advantage of the thicker rotor is better heat dissipation for downhills and towing.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
41,852
Posts
903,537
Members
33,365
Latest member
rossivey
Top