Relieving that crank pressure

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

The Struggle

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2015
Posts
38
Reaction score
83
Location
Converse, TX
First Name
Blaine
Truck Year
1981
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
So for my hot rod build I have been pondering some research on ridding my engine of blow by and crank pressures. From what I've seen people just weld in a vacuum to each valve cover and hook that to an electric vacuum source then through a oil seperator to catch the oil mist. Has anyone used this system or any ideas? I was thinking of running a vacuum line through the rear of my intake from the oil valley which would connect to the headers via a welded in tips in the exhaust stream to create a vacuum. It would pull more vacuum with more RPM (to an extent). The goal is to rid the engine of the blow by and oil mist so it will exchange oil better and keep them Molly piston rings sealed and lasting longer. Indeed I'll use a filter for each valve cover, separate of the vacuum line to draw in fresh air and use a small canister with steel wool to assist in collecting the oil mist which will be atop a vertical line to also help collect oil mist via gravity as well. If you guys could please give me any tips, pointers or bruises to my plan because I enjoy constructive criticism and thoughtful ideas.

Respectfully,

The Struggle
 

da_raabi

Trailer Park Supervisor
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Posts
1,403
Reaction score
901
Location
FloriDUH
First Name
Adam
Truck Year
1986
Truck Model
c30
Engine Size
454
Doesn't a PCV system accomplish this?
 

The Struggle

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2015
Posts
38
Reaction score
83
Location
Converse, TX
First Name
Blaine
Truck Year
1981
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
Yes is does, but I have seen people say that these are only so good. To me it seems more beneficial to have a constant vacuum to pull the waste instead of a pressure control valve to need pressure to relieve the gases. My thought is the oil pressure will be the best thing to seal the rings and not having as much fuel mixed with the oil will keep performance up with friction and pressures down. But then again I don't know how much psi the pcv needs to open (need to do a vacuum test on my newer truck to see) but I also don't want a ton of vacuum drawn in the case either because that could just draw oil and gases through and away from the rings causing ring failure. My ultimate goal is 40 psi for oil and 0 crank case pressure so that rotating assembly is smoothly turned as possibly. What do you think?
 

DoubleDingo

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Posts
10,370
Reaction score
14,900
Location
Right where I am
First Name
Bagoomba
Truck Year
1981
Truck Model
81-C20 Silverado Camper Special-TH400-4.10s
Engine Size
Carb'ed Vortec 350
I was considering something similar because I have an engine with the oil fill tube and the breather cap. The breather cap is spewing oil all over the place so that to me means there is a lot of pressure in the engine. I was thinking about running another tube from the driver's side to a tee that went to the breather fitting on the air cleaner. But I was also concerned about drawing too much oil through that and clogging the little filter element. So I am going to be watching this thread to see what others think on the subject. Although, I have seen setups where the breather hose from the valve cover wasn't connected to anything. I didn't like that idea because it could allow dirt to easily migrate into the engine.
 

The Struggle

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2015
Posts
38
Reaction score
83
Location
Converse, TX
First Name
Blaine
Truck Year
1981
Truck Model
K10
Engine Size
350
I've seen people redirect the pvc and hose from the oil valley or at the valve cover/s right into the carb vacuum line or at the breather fitting. Great idea but I don't want oil back through my intake and on my cylinders and valves. That's why I'm amused at the idea of an exhaust vacuum drawn system. They use to do that back in the day or redirect the gases via a hose to atmospheric pressure with a variant vacuum like you can use in an exhaust pipe. That's why I like the exhaust type system, because as long as the engine is running the lines are under vacuum. I'll probably just build this system and run with it and see how well it performs. If i don't like it I can just plug it up with bolts in place of the parts. I'll be sure to build thread it because it saves engine and oil life alot and will cost less than $30 bucks to do.
 

MadOgre

Full Access Member
Joined
May 4, 2014
Posts
4,090
Reaction score
49
Location
NA
First Name
NA
Truck Year
NA
Truck Model
NA
Engine Size
NA
I have a tube going from the valve cover to the inside of my air filter to access clean air.

I do not have any filter just pure open 3/4" hose and

I have good clean 3/8" tube for the PCV valve to the carb.

I do not have vacuum leaks or plugged filters which is the biggest source of poorly functioning PCV systems.

With the unrestricted tubing going to the air cleaner base there is very low restriction on the intake of fresh air into the crank case, allowing the vacuum on the PCV valve to do its job properly


I gotta say my crank case is squeaky clean too
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
42,332
Posts
913,847
Members
33,831
Latest member
Kipps5000
Top