Driver4r's Monte

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Driver4r

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Posts
3,087
Reaction score
40
Location
Nebraska
First Name
Trevor
Truck Year
76,74
Truck Model
k10,c20
Engine Size
355/th350/np203, 454/th350/ff-rear
Not in the Th350 converters. Now if you have a Th400 converter with the lugs then that one is a hair stronger than the Th350 with the flat pad where you have to both Nut and Bolt the pads to the flywheel but in the Th350 converters, the flat pad units are best. They are also getting to be rare and hard to find cores. The guy who bought my 88 Burb, works for Transtar in OKC, when he seen all my Th350 converters with pads, he about got a boner. Told me don't even get rid of those, of course I knew that already.

Lol, this one came out of a 70 Impala. But of course its not staying, the engine lugs against the convertor when I put it in gear, cause the stall is to low.
 

HotRodPC

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
47,017
Reaction score
9,029
Location
OKC, OK
First Name
HotRod
Truck Year
85 K20 LWB
Truck Model
Silverado
Engine Size
454 - Turbo 400 - 3.73
Lol, this one came out of a 70 Impala. But of course its not staying, the engine lugs against the convertor when I put it in gear, cause the stall is to low.

That might be what you're thinking of the flat pads not being better. The flat pad converters are all 1400-1600 stall unless you have it worked over, the bolt lug type can be 1400-1600 or 1600-1800. But the flat pad models are stronger. I can't recall now what's stronger in them. It might be a bigger Stator, don't recall for sure now.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
29,205
Reaction score
24,332
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
I just thought they made the change to the threaded lugs to speed up the process on the assembly line.
 

Stewzer55

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Posts
2,243
Reaction score
66
Location
Ohio
First Name
Stew
Truck Year
1988
Truck Model
R30
Engine Size
350 TBI
That's a much more logical reason, but I could see the threaded lugs being weaker just due to the trade off. Mind you I'm no engineer and more of a healthcare person.
 

HotRodPC

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
47,017
Reaction score
9,029
Location
OKC, OK
First Name
HotRod
Truck Year
85 K20 LWB
Truck Model
Silverado
Engine Size
454 - Turbo 400 - 3.73
I just thought they made the change to the threaded lugs to speed up the process on the assembly line.

That could be possible, but it just so happens the flat pad units have better internals. I prefer the flat pads myself. Yes, it's slower on install, but in the event you strip the threads out of a bolt lug, then in most cases, you're pulling a trans to make a repair if you're handy. If you're not handy then you're buying a new converter too.

I've still got a flat pad 11in furnace brazed 3000 stall that I had in my 64 GMC that was lightly used. I bet it doesn't have 1000 miles on it. I hope to have a purpose for it someday.
 

Driver4r

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Posts
3,087
Reaction score
40
Location
Nebraska
First Name
Trevor
Truck Year
76,74
Truck Model
k10,c20
Engine Size
355/th350/np203, 454/th350/ff-rear
That might be what you're thinking of the flat pads not being better. The flat pad converters are all 1400-1600 stall unless you have it worked over, the bolt lug type can be 1400-1600 or 1600-1800. But the flat pad models are stronger. I can't recall now what's stronger in them. It might be a bigger Stator, don't recall for sure now.

Nope, its the original convertor. I pulled it out myself.
 

Driver4r

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Posts
3,087
Reaction score
40
Location
Nebraska
First Name
Trevor
Truck Year
76,74
Truck Model
k10,c20
Engine Size
355/th350/np203, 454/th350/ff-rear
topped it back off today, so far I have put 4 full tanks of gas thrue it, plus some. So actually probly around 5.5ish. Still needs some fine tuning, and definetly a convertor and shifter(on the floor).
 

Driver4r

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Posts
3,087
Reaction score
40
Location
Nebraska
First Name
Trevor
Truck Year
76,74
Truck Model
k10,c20
Engine Size
355/th350/np203, 454/th350/ff-rear
You know the saying, "You can never have enough power, your always going to want more" Well I know the feeling lol, Now ive been reading into Go Fast Gas, looking at mabey a 100Shot(4lb/min). I would have it kick in at around 3000, but have a toggle to kill the controller so I wouldn't hit it accidently during normal driving. It SHOULD take it XD. Mabey start with a 75shot when the time comes. But befor I start looking into that I have some other priorities, like convertor, Rear differential, shifter.
 

Driver4r

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Posts
3,087
Reaction score
40
Location
Nebraska
First Name
Trevor
Truck Year
76,74
Truck Model
k10,c20
Engine Size
355/th350/np203, 454/th350/ff-rear
Well. It's nice to see that Noone really noticed I was gone...........

But I'm back for now.
Here's an update. I've just been driving it alot since I got it on the road previously. I put those 15x9's with the n50's on the back. And it was all great... until yesterday. All of a sudden. After it warms up(this is later at night). It all of a sudden doesn't want to idle. It started as not wanting to idle well in gear. And when I got home tonight it stalled in park. And when I say not idle, I mean the rpm drops below the capable rpm range and it loped to slow to be able to idle.....

Any ideas???? This just started. And I've only noticed it at night thus far.
 

89Suburban

Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Posts
24,569
Reaction score
5,930
Location
Southeast PA
First Name
Paw Paw
Truck Year
2007
Truck Model
Chevrolet Tahoe LT
Engine Size
5.3, 4WD
Do a vacuum test on it.
 

Driver4r

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Posts
3,087
Reaction score
40
Location
Nebraska
First Name
Trevor
Truck Year
76,74
Truck Model
k10,c20
Engine Size
355/th350/np203, 454/th350/ff-rear
Do a vacuum test on it.

I havnt done one when its acting up. But thr cam is on the radical side as far as vacume goes. 11.5 in park, and 7 in gear.
 

Driver4r

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Posts
3,087
Reaction score
40
Location
Nebraska
First Name
Trevor
Truck Year
76,74
Truck Model
k10,c20
Engine Size
355/th350/np203, 454/th350/ff-rear
Ill add some more info.
Warm it runs around 190─210 which is normal.
Cold it has 40psi at idle and 10 when hot, also ok.
Idle is set at 750-800.
 

350runner

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Posts
2,858
Reaction score
224
Location
tx
First Name
Ceasar
Truck Year
82
Truck Model
c10
Engine Size
350
Sounds like it is all in the carb.
 

Stewzer55

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Posts
2,243
Reaction score
66
Location
Ohio
First Name
Stew
Truck Year
1988
Truck Model
R30
Engine Size
350 TBI
Vacuum leak.
 

Driver4r

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Posts
3,087
Reaction score
40
Location
Nebraska
First Name
Trevor
Truck Year
76,74
Truck Model
k10,c20
Engine Size
355/th350/np203, 454/th350/ff-rear
No thats actually what it should pull for vacume.
But today when i got home i ran vacume and hooked up a snap-on cylender delay again. And all cylenders reacted about the same.

So ive come to the conclusion that its just a really bad case of heat soak. Because there is no flow of air under the hood othan the radiator and fan. And we ran the fuel line alot like stock but not rested against the engine. Also i have an aluminum intake to try and keep temp down. But since theres no airflow. All its doing is heating up the carb.

Befor this heat weve been having(Also very humid), it ram fairly good. Its always had little bit of heat soak. But never this bad
 

Forum statistics

Threads
42,329
Posts
913,809
Members
33,828
Latest member
builder100
Top