.030" quench: too tight?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

rumblebox

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Posts
164
Reaction score
42
Location
Victoria, TX
First Name
Carlton
Truck Year
74
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
468
I'm trying to get as much compression and as little ping as possible out of my 473 with flat tops and 781 heads. Instead of having the machine shop zero the deck, i want to go down another .010 so i can have a .030 quench without having to pay extra for thinner gaskets.

It will make about 560hp/540tq and spin about 5500-6000.

I ran a .036 quench on my 6.0 with LS3 heads spinning 7k with no issues, but I'm still learning about big blocks.
 

MikeB

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Posts
1,749
Reaction score
936
Location
North Texas
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1969
Truck Model
C10
Engine Size
355
From what I've read, .035" is the absolute safe minimum, except for aluminum rods which need lots more. I know you have a big block, but I usually shoot for .040"-.050" in a small block. John Lingenfelter said a .038" gasket with the piston down the hole .005" (.043" total) is perfect for a small block.
 

68post

very, VERY, limited access member
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Posts
279
Reaction score
96
Location
Indianapolis
First Name
Tim
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
84 K30 SRW Silverado, 85 C20 C6P
Engine Size
454, TBD
A bigger bore piston will have more rock in it's bore. .030 is way too tight !
 

Forum statistics

Threads
42,197
Posts
911,158
Members
33,691
Latest member
1977chevyc30
Top