Clutch safety switch delete

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Disco

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2022
Posts
87
Reaction score
82
Location
Texarkana, TX
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
C10 "Big 10"
Engine Size
350 4-bolt
Since we're on the topic, I'd also suggest cutting the dash for a DIN style radio, adding a windshield visor to further reduce gas milage, drilling a hole to vent the gas cap, put some 6x9 speakers in the lower doors and anything else that annoys the Snowflakes. If you can swing it, do a LS swap and paint the valve cover mounted coils a bright contrasting color. To hell with the masses! It's your truck, do what you want with it. The snowflakes can fill out a "Hurt feelings report".
this was the best thing I’ve read all day! Lol
 

SirRobyn0

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2019
Posts
6,698
Reaction score
11,149
Location
In the woods in Western Washington
First Name
Rob
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
C20
Engine Size
305
Not that the OP is going to care about this story, but to the rest of you that shared good reasons not to bypass safety devices you'll read and understand this story.

About 15 - 20 years ago I watch a truck leach forward in a shop I use to work at, pinning the mechanic between the car and a metal building pole. Because he was bent over when the truck struck him he was pinned by the shoulders. One dislocated the other side broken. The man can longer work as a mechanic and last I talked to him he expected to have life long pain. All because a clutch safety switch was bypassed, and the truck brought into the shop. No one knew.
 

SirRobyn0

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2019
Posts
6,698
Reaction score
11,149
Location
In the woods in Western Washington
First Name
Rob
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
C20
Engine Size
305
There’s probably more than a dozen bolts holding the front clip to the frame and cab, too. But if I Had to choose which vehicle to be in a wreck with, I’d choose the Volkswagen with the crumple zones and the airbags.

Everyone freaking out about the safety concerns of bypassing the clutch switch on an inherently unsafe vehicle is like everyone freaking out about me carrying a jug of gasoline into a burning building with me. Is putting a jug of gas in a fire a bad idea? Yes. Doesn’t change the fact that I’M ALREADY ON FIRE! Lol
I'm sure you have no desire to read what I'm about to write so maybe just skip this post or talk to someone else about while I post this..... I don't think anyone is freaking out. With the low number of posts you have I'd hazard a guess that none of us know you very well. So we all are just trying to help you out with a friendly warning. You don't want that bit of help or advice and that's fine, you have the info you were after......
 

Disco

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2022
Posts
87
Reaction score
82
Location
Texarkana, TX
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
C10 "Big 10"
Engine Size
350 4-bolt
Not that the OP is going to care about this story, but to the rest of you that shared good reasons not to bypass safety devices you'll read and understand this story.

About 15 - 20 years ago I watch a truck leach forward in a shop I use to work at, pinning the mechanic between the car and a metal building pole. Because he was bent over when the truck struck him he was pinned by the shoulders. One dislocated the other side broken. The man can longer work as a mechanic and last I talked to him he expected to have life long pain. All because a clutch safety switch was bypassed, and the truck brought into the shop. No one knew.
Cool story (you asked for the sarcasm)! Three things:
1) for this to apply to me, my truck would have to go to a shop.
2) this could have happened in ANY of the multitudes of vehicles that did not come equipped with a clutch switch in the first place.
3) someone didn’t do their job. Why were the keys in the ignition? Why was the vehicle not chocked? Why was the mechanic over the front of the vehicle while it was being started? There were SO many other safety procedures not followed, I don’t think we can blame that on the clutch switch.
 

Disco

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2022
Posts
87
Reaction score
82
Location
Texarkana, TX
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
C10 "Big 10"
Engine Size
350 4-bolt
I'm sure you have no desire to read what I'm about to write so maybe just skip this post or talk to someone else about while I post this..... I don't think anyone is freaking out. With the low number of posts you have I'd hazard a guess that none of us know you very well. So we all are just trying to help you out with a friendly warning. You don't want that bit of help or advice and that's fine, you have the info you were after......
This is my last post on the matter.

I’m talking about how even after I’ve pointed out that while I understand the reasons for the concern, I disagree with them, and I was only looking for a yes or no answer in the first place. However, nearly everyone who has posted to this thread wants to beat me over the head with the safety bible for not wanting to deal with replacing an already broken switch on a old pickup that will only be driven by me! I’m not disabling a functioning safety device, I’m bypassing a switch that is currently in 3 pieces.

Mechanic shops? I do my own mechanical work, and what few things I don’t do (like tires), I do “customer pull in/out” on. Plus, with this being an old truck with an analog odometer, there would be no good reason any tech would need to put the key in the ignition while it was there.
I do care about safety. I really do. If the switch wasn’t already broken, I wouldn’t be messing around with it. But ALL of the plastic in this truck is sun baked and really brittle, and I know if I start dismantling the dash to get access to the switch’s mounting point, I will have to replace more than half the plastic parts in the dash as they start crumbling at my touch.
I will replace these things - and probably the switch, too, although that hidden immobilizer switch idea is a good one… - eventually, but I’m not ready for a restoration job. I just need the damn truck running and driving so I can haul some things from the hardware store or to the dump…
My point is, and has been, that since I was 15, I have owned 17 vehicles, including this truck. Of those 17, only 5 have had slushboxes, and of the 12 manuals only 3 of them have had clutch switches: a 2004 Jetta, a 2007 Suzuki, and a 78 Chevy truck… the other cars range from years 1971-2000. That’s right, my 2000 Dodge Neon did NOT have a clutch switch, nor did my 95 Jetta. Point: a large majority of vehicles with manual transmissions DID NOT COME EQUIPPED with clutch switches.
 

SquareRoot

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Posts
3,656
Reaction score
6,589
Location
Arizona
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
85
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
Like I said earlier...its your truck, screw the masses. I bet this proud owner removed his NSS.
You must be registered for see images attach
 

Vbb199

B-rate Hillbilly Customs
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Posts
8,871
Reaction score
14,885
Location
Salisbury NC
First Name
Vince
Truck Year
89, 79
Truck Model
89 Suburban R1500, 79 C10
Engine Size
350, 502
That mf got a 2 speed power glide,
What nss ? LOL

Just to be honest.......... and don't tell anyone.. .


Nothing I have has nss anymore, except my wife's suv.
For good reason too.
She's just driving it, not fixing it and not diagnosing issues.
 

Disco

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2022
Posts
87
Reaction score
82
Location
Texarkana, TX
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
1978
Truck Model
C10 "Big 10"
Engine Size
350 4-bolt
Like I said earlier...its your truck, screw the masses. I bet this proud owner removed his NSS.
You must be registered for see images attach
This made me chuckle. It’s a… unique rig, to say the least. I bet it gets plenty of attention at shows…
 

Bextreme04

Full Access Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Posts
4,135
Reaction score
4,983
Location
Oregon
First Name
Eric
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K25
Engine Size
350-4bbl
These are some very extreme examples and only the Toyota is really relevant to my original post. Military equipment is extremely dangerous and should never be tampered with. Same goes for commercial and industrial equipment. But as far as a clutch switch in an old Chevy truck where most of them barely have FLOORS… I think you’re worried over nothing.

That Toyota tale… how fast did that thing idle? Did he not have the brake set? He couldn’t walk beside it, open the door, and turn off the ignition or knock it out of gear or slam on the brake? Seems like we’re missing part of the story. The few times I’ve accidentally started the car in gear (before the muscle memory of “clutch in, wiggle stick” set in), the vehicle jumped a little before I uttered an expletive and let go of the key, and it didn’t even cover a distance of 12 inches.
Everyone has their own level of risk acceptance. You are having to do a whole lot of justification of why its not unsafe... when it is obviously an added risk. I'm not saying people are definitely going to die if you do it, just pointing out it is an increased risk. Also, military stuff isn't "extremely dangerous and shouldn't be tampered with". Its often a simplified version of civilian equipment with a ****** paint job slapped on it.

As for the toyota, he was in the drivers seat and just starting it up after an oil change. The truck did something unexpected and he froze(it happens.. I've seen experienced combat vets just freeze and lock up when things go bad) with his hand holding it in the start position until after it slammed into the apartment building. Things happen fast, especially in a situation where this is likely to occur. Someone is distracted, maybe sleep deprived, maybe inexperienced, and the truck does something scary and completely unexpected.

I'm guilty of bypassing stuff for troubleshooting and expedience too, it just seems like a stupid additional risk to add when its a cheap part that only takes a few minutes to replace and is obviously reliable enough to have lasted the last 45 years. You aren't going to be doing any less work by bypassing it, and if something DOES happen you could be liable for any injuries or death that happens as a result.
 

SquareRoot

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Posts
3,656
Reaction score
6,589
Location
Arizona
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
85
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
The issue I had with my switch is the self adjusting feature. It sets at the lowest point the pedal is depressed. So, it only takes one time of pushing the pedal to the floor and thats where it sets itself. Now everytime you start it you have to push the pedal all the way to the floor. Fair enough.

However, My clutch is new and adjusted to where it should be. I'm happy with it. The problem is if I push the clutch in much past the point it disengages it "overtravels" which is annoying and I'm sure not good for the diaphragm fingers.

Short of rigging some sort of clutch pedal travel limiting stop, it was just easier to S..tc..n the switcharoo.
 

SquareRoot

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Posts
3,656
Reaction score
6,589
Location
Arizona
First Name
Mike
Truck Year
85
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
350
Here's my thread about it back when...


I don't know if yours is the same. Someone should ask me about my pedal assembly mods when I swapped in the 4500. juicy.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
28,956
Reaction score
23,465
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
Not that the OP is going to care about this story, but to the rest of you that shared good reasons not to bypass safety devices you'll read and understand this story.

About 15 - 20 years ago I watch a truck leach forward in a shop I use to work at, pinning the mechanic between the car and a metal building pole. Because he was bent over when the truck struck him he was pinned by the shoulders. One dislocated the other side broken. The man can longer work as a mechanic and last I talked to him he expected to have life long pain. All because a clutch safety switch was bypassed, and the truck brought into the shop. No one knew.

But how is this the fault of the clutch switch? Why was the vehicle being started without pushing in the clutch? I'm assuming that the operator assumed it was in neutral and just wanted to crank it over? If that is the case, they were aware that there was not a functional clutch safety switch. Also, even if there was an operational switch and they pushed in the clutch, since they thought it was in neutral, if they started it then the vehicle would have lurched forward anyway when they let up on the clutch.

There may be more details, but at the moment to someone that was not there, it certainly seems like the operator was 100% at fault. For either not checking to be sure it was in neutral, or not paying attention and thinking the vehicle had an auto trans.
 

Bextreme04

Full Access Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Posts
4,135
Reaction score
4,983
Location
Oregon
First Name
Eric
Truck Year
1980
Truck Model
K25
Engine Size
350-4bbl
But how is this the fault of the clutch switch? Why was the vehicle being started without pushing in the clutch? I'm assuming that the operator assumed it was in neutral and just wanted to crank it over? If that is the case, they were aware that there was not a functional clutch safety switch. Also, even if there was an operational switch and they pushed in the clutch, since they thought it was in neutral, if they started it then the vehicle would have lurched forward anyway when they let up on the clutch.

There may be more details, but at the moment to someone that was not there, it certainly seems like the operator was 100% at fault. For either not checking to be sure it was in neutral, or not paying attention and thinking the vehicle had an auto trans.
It's not about fault. Accidents are almost never a single point. They are a chain of failures, mistakes, or oversights that all come together to have this bad outcome. In aircraft accident investigations they are often referred to as "Accident chains" and "finding the hole in the swiss cheese". In @SirRobyn0's story it was the final link in the chain. There had to be some other failure in there, but the final link that "should" have prevented the injury had been bypassed and was non-functional.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
41,849
Posts
903,439
Members
33,362
Latest member
Dhatch84
Top