Adapt 4x4 Th350 in Place of 700r4

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

TRAZOII

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2017
Posts
31
Reaction score
3
Location
Phoenix
First Name
Anthony
Truck Year
85
Truck Model
K10 Sub
Engine Size
350
I have a question about the swap. I did the kit swap with the longer tail shaft. Everything fits perfectly. Only issue I have is I think the torque converter is too small. What size TC would be used for a 85 k10 suburban in a th350? My truck seems to be missing power after the swap. Almost like its slipping. The th350 was fresh from a rebuild. And the shift points seem to be lower. Any one have any ideas?

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 

Jason Deckard

THE KVAN 4x4 MAN
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Posts
129
Reaction score
170
Location
Ellettsville Indiana
First Name
Jason
Truck Year
1989
Truck Model
Chevrolet Pathfinder KVAN 4x4 highly modified. Built...not bought
Engine Size
Ramjet 350, NV4500 manual, 3.73, Atlas II
There is not a standard size that is used. It is based on the power curve of your engine. A stock 400 turbo converter is 12" I think. A stock 350 turbo is 11 inches. The smaller the diameter, the more stall speed you get out of it. The stall speed also has a lot to do with the torque output of your engine. If you have a bigger camshaft, you would want a smaller converter to help with idle-in-gear problems and to allow your engine to Rev a little higher to get that cam working. I have used a 400 converter in a 350 transmission and vice-versa. I don't know where you are lacking power, but you also have to consider that the 700r4 you had was equipped with a locking converter. There is a clutch that is in the convertER that locks up after it got up to a certain speed. Chances are your 350 doesn't have that. They were junk.

Hope it's helps
 

HotRodPC

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
47,008
Reaction score
8,977
Location
OKC, OK
First Name
HotRod
Truck Year
85 K20 LWB
Truck Model
Silverado
Engine Size
454 - Turbo 400 - 3.73
I have a question about the swap. I did the kit swap with the longer tail shaft. Everything fits perfectly. Only issue I have is I think the torque converter is too small. What size TC would be used for a 85 k10 suburban in a th350? My truck seems to be missing power after the swap. Almost like its slipping. The th350 was fresh from a rebuild. And the shift points seem to be lower. Any one have any ideas?

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Have you counted your shifts and certain you're taking off in 1st gear? Do keep in mind, the 700r4 has a 3.06:1 first gear ratio, and the Th350 has a 2.52:1 or so first gear ratio so there will be a hair of difference since 700r4 has a deeper 1st gear ratio.
 

fast68chevy

I am the original fast68chevy
Joined
Oct 17, 2020
Posts
172
Reaction score
88
Location
LINCOLN IL
First Name
RANDY
Truck Year
1975
Truck Model
C20
Engine Size
350
hmm well with our bone stock 82 K10 shortbed it was a 700r4 truck factory and it still is the 208 case and we stuck a th350 tranny in it and didnt change swap anything else out at all. so i dunno what ppl are talking about being different.,. cuz nothing was.,., been driving it 20 years now with the th350 now.. still has the 700r4 OD indicator plate in cluster. 82 to 84-1/2 700r4 were weaker and higher failure rates didnt have the aux valve body and other upgrades yet. so going to th350 was a upgrade actually.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
28,966
Reaction score
23,492
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
hmm well with our bone stock 82 K10 shortbed it was a 700r4 truck factory and it still is the 208 case and we stuck a th350 tranny in it and didnt change swap anything else out at all. so i dunno what ppl are talking about being different.,. cuz nothing was.,., been driving it 20 years now with the th350 now.. still has the 700r4 OD indicator plate in cluster. 82 to 84-1/2 700r4 were weaker and higher failure rates didnt have the aux valve body and other upgrades yet. so going to th350 was a upgrade actually.

That's because it's a direct swap if you install a th350 that already had a 208 behind it. But most people don't have that as an option and are using a 2wd trans along with a spacer. So THAT'S what people are talking about being different.
 

HotRodPC

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
47,008
Reaction score
8,977
Location
OKC, OK
First Name
HotRod
Truck Year
85 K20 LWB
Truck Model
Silverado
Engine Size
454 - Turbo 400 - 3.73
hmm well with our bone stock 82 K10 shortbed it was a 700r4 truck factory and it still is the 208 case and we stuck a th350 tranny in it and didnt change swap anything else out at all. so i dunno what ppl are talking about being different.,. cuz nothing was.,., been driving it 20 years now with the th350 now.. still has the 700r4 OD indicator plate in cluster. 82 to 84-1/2 700r4 were weaker and higher failure rates didnt have the aux valve body and other upgrades yet. so going to th350 was a upgrade actually.
The Th350 with a NP208 is hard to find from the factory. GM did convert many 700r4 trucks back to Th350. Yours obviously wasn't one of them since you mention the gear indicator is still 700r4. When GM did it, they converted the indicator and plate in the column too.
 

scenic760

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2021
Posts
311
Reaction score
198
Location
SoCal
First Name
Chris
Truck Year
1981
Truck Model
Suburban K10
Engine Size
350
I tried posting up a thread but you guys sound like you may have already worked through what I was asking....

I have a th350 with a short shaft I would like to swap into my 1981 Suburban that has a th350 in it now and an np208. I have read a few different forums that you can take of the tailpiece and lop off 3/4" of the output shaft and everything bolts right up? Does that sound legit?
 

HotRodPC

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
47,008
Reaction score
8,977
Location
OKC, OK
First Name
HotRod
Truck Year
85 K20 LWB
Truck Model
Silverado
Engine Size
454 - Turbo 400 - 3.73
I tried posting up a thread but you guys sound like you may have already worked through what I was asking....

I have a th350 with a short shaft I would like to swap into my 1981 Suburban that has a th350 in it now and an np208. I have read a few different forums that you can take of the tailpiece and lop off 3/4" of the output shaft and everything bolts right up? Does that sound legit?
I can't swear to that since I've not dealt with a NP208 and Th350. I think those are a hair rare since by the time the NP208 was used, the 700r4 was used most of the time. Most of, but not all, most of the Th350 would have had the NP203. It would seem like it could work though. @bucket probably knows more about what years a NP208 and Th350 were OEM. It couldn't be to many.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
28,966
Reaction score
23,492
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
I can't swear to that since I've not dealt with a NP208 and Th350. I think those are a hair rare since by the time the NP208 was used, the 700r4 was used most of the time. Most of, but not all, most of the Th350 would have had the NP203. It would seem like it could work though. @bucket probably knows more about what years a NP208 and Th350 were OEM. It couldn't be to many.

They were mostly all made in '81. The 700r4 became available in '82 and from what I've seen, most trucks got that option.

I'm a bit foggy on the subject, but from what I remember, the th350 used with the 208 was an odd duck. I think it had a longer output and it's own t-case adapter that made the overall length the same as the 700/208 combo. Which would make the short tail th350 not an option to swap in. But don't quote me on that... it's not a combo I'm familiar with, I'm tired and I've been scattered brained lately from being so busy, lol.
 

HotRodPC

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
47,008
Reaction score
8,977
Location
OKC, OK
First Name
HotRod
Truck Year
85 K20 LWB
Truck Model
Silverado
Engine Size
454 - Turbo 400 - 3.73
They were mostly all made in '81. The 700r4 became available in '82 and from what I've seen, most trucks got that option.

I'm a bit foggy on the subject, but from what I remember, the th350 used with the 208 was an odd duck. I think it had a longer output and it's own t-case adapter that made the overall length the same as the 700/208 combo. Which would make the short tail th350 not an option to swap in. But don't quote me on that... it's not a combo I'm familiar with, I'm tired and I've been scattered brained lately from being so busy, lol.
That would seem to reason to me too since all the Tcase adapters after that year seem to make all the dimensions the same as far as driveshaft and linkages. But, If he's just wanting to use his Th350, he should be good to go since the Tcase adapter that's bolted to his NP208 should be the one he needs. I'd day the best thing for him to do is measure the Tcase adapter and compare that to the tailshaft housing of the 2wd unit. I'd almost bet it's going to work as he's been told.
 

bucket

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Posts
28,966
Reaction score
23,492
Location
Usually not in Ohio
First Name
Andy
Truck Year
'77, '78, '79, '84, '88
Truck Model
K5 thru K30
Engine Size
350-454
That would seem to reason to me too since all the Tcase adapters after that year seem to make all the dimensions the same as far as driveshaft and linkages. But, If he's just wanting to use his Th350, he should be good to go since the Tcase adapter that's bolted to his NP208 should be the one he needs. I'd day the best thing for him to do is measure the Tcase adapter and compare that to the tailshaft housing of the 2wd unit. I'd almost bet it's going to work as he's been told.

That's true, a 700/208 adapter should work fine. You would just have to use the aftermarket spacer in addition to trimming the shaft.

Even a late style "short foot" t-case adapter would work fine if the correct tall one cannot be found. It would just need a "W" or "wavy" style crossmember to match.
 

Albrigap

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2021
Posts
68
Reaction score
69
Location
South Dakota
First Name
Alan
Truck Year
1991
Truck Model
Suburban
Engine Size
350
We bought many of these aluminum adapters for the 4x4 350's and cut the tail shaft in the chop saw. Never had a problem.

I had an 82 GMC C15 4x2 6.2 diesel with the 2.42 rear end. I threw away the garbage 700R4 and went to a 400 turbo. Never hurt the mileage a bit. The 700 in overdrive with the 2.42 would have put the rpm's at 55 mph just over idle.
 

HotRodPC

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
47,008
Reaction score
8,977
Location
OKC, OK
First Name
HotRod
Truck Year
85 K20 LWB
Truck Model
Silverado
Engine Size
454 - Turbo 400 - 3.73
We bought many of these aluminum adapters for the 4x4 350's and cut the tail shaft in the chop saw. Never had a problem.

I had an 82 GMC C15 4x2 6.2 diesel with the 2.42 rear end. I threw away the garbage 700R4 and went to a 400 turbo. Never hurt the mileage a bit. The 700 in overdrive with the 2.42 would have put the rpm's at 55 mph just over idle.
Yes, the 2.42, 2.73 and 3.08 with the 700r4 is such a waste and also a trans killer. If you have a 700r4, you need 3.42, 3.73 or 4.10's to not only help out that weak transmission but help your around town mpg and being able to take off from a stop or light or get on the freeway with enough speed to keep from getting ran over.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
41,859
Posts
903,676
Members
33,372
Latest member
83elcowes
Top