Is a hydroboost swap worth it?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Dutch Rutter

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Posts
1,070
Reaction score
1,185
Location
Independence, Or
First Name
Joshua
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
5.7
Hey guys,

So I have an 86 C20 that originally came with a diesel. The diesel is long been replaced by a motor that I will be pulling before I sell the truck as a roller or maybe even part it. She also came with the HUGE radiator, which I haven't decided if I'll take out or not. However, it does in fact have the hydro boost for the brakes.

Would it be worth it to swap that onto my 83 K20 that currently has the Vacuum boost or should I leave well enough alone?

From what I've read the swap is pretty easy. Bring over the booster, power steering pump, the 4 associated hoses, and bolt everything right in.
 

Half Assed

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Posts
116
Reaction score
7
Location
SARASOTA
First Name
D
Truck Year
1987, 1988
Truck Model
R20 3+3, V20 Suburban
Engine Size
'bout tree fiddy
The pedal assembly is slightly different, but yes I would do the swap. It is worth the hassle.


Have you not driven the C20? The difference in braking power is significant.
 

1987 GMC Jimmy

Automobile Hoarder
Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Posts
5,848
Reaction score
2,387
Location
Mississippi
First Name
Jesse
Truck Year
1987
Truck Model
V1500 Jimmy
Engine Size
350
I think if you're gonna be towing or hauling some heavy stuff, it would be, but if you're doing light duty truck stuff with it, no. If it was a big ole K30 with a 454 or a diesel, I'd say go for it. If it was a C10 with a 350, I'd say no. It honestly depends on what you're doing with it in my mind. What kind of shape are your main brake components (rotors, pads, drums, shoes, cylinders, and calipers) and your fluid in? If you're not feeling so confident in how your brakes are doing, I'd suggest tackling these parts, and if your fluid is especially dirty or old, I'd bleed it out of there, and put in some new DOT 3. Brake fluid is hygroscopic, and exposure to even relative humidity conditions corrupts its ability to exert hydraulic force on your braking components over time. I'm sure you know all this, but still. And hey, if you have the stuff already, it may not even matter what you're doing with the truck.
 

skysurfer

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Posts
2,643
Reaction score
1,995
Location
west coast
First Name
John
Truck Year
1989 Suburban
Truck Model
V2500
Engine Size
5.7/TH400/NP241C
Agree with what's been said already. If your current setup can make the tires skid to a stop then hydroboost might not make that much difference to you. My issue was brakes that couldn't get anywhere close to lockup after installing 35" tires. HB gave me 2.5 times the braking pressure over vacuum so the conversion was well worth it. You already have the parts so a lot of the work is done, and to repeat Half Assed, be sure to use the hb brake pedal if you do the swap.
 

yevgenievich

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2014
Posts
4,781
Reaction score
3,300
Location
Texas
First Name
Viktor
Truck Year
sad
Truck Model
very sad
Engine Size
less sad
If you decide not to do it, I am inline to buy the hydroboost set up.
 

Dutch Rutter

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Posts
1,070
Reaction score
1,185
Location
Independence, Or
First Name
Joshua
Truck Year
1984
Truck Model
K20
Engine Size
5.7
I have driven the C20 but it has been several years ago. One thing that always stood out to me was the reliability of that system.

@ Camar0 That is the exact radiator which is in the 86. Its out right massive. I want to say its a 4 core however, its about a foot wider on each side then the normal gasoline rads I've seen. When I was driving the truck before it always kept the lil SBC cool to the point where my heater hardly worked. Could probably have been fixed with a different thermostat but never paid it much attention.

I do plan on keeping the K20 for a long time. It is basically going to be my on going project that I hope one day will end up with a weekend warrior/haul/DD resto-mod. Currently I don't haul very heavy loads (small trailer with 3 quads and camping gear) but that will probably change in the future which will also bring air bags and other changes to accommodate that need. Thinking about long term upgrades and such I should hang onto the radiator for when I get around to putting a newer larger motor in (diesel, LS, 8.1 haven't decided yet).

My brakes now currently work great. I only have 33s however like I said above long term that hopefully will change. I think I'll keep the Hydro system and swap it in. Figure since I have the parts I might as well keep the better setup and use it. Great note for the brake pedal BTW. I completely would have overlooked that.

Thanks for the help everyone! I'm glad I asked instead of getting rid of parts that I'd later wish I kept.

On a side note: I read somewhere that the vac boost gives about 1000 lbs of breaking force while the hydro gives 2400 lbs of force or so. That is a huge improvement IMHO.

I probably should also pull the TH400 out of it and sell it separately, or would that also be something to hang onto for the future improvements/replacement if my 700r4 goes?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
41,859
Posts
903,678
Members
33,372
Latest member
83elcowes
Top